|
womaninchrist -> RE: Mental Health Debate - One Stop Thread (10/29/2006 9:58:59 PM)
|
Yes, NAMI is the National Alliance on Mental Illness. The first time I heard of such a law as one that would (or at least could) forcibly treat ANYONE with a mental illness was when one of the laws in New Mexico was in process of approval - I THINK it was the version of "Kendra's law" that was recently put on hold by the courts that had been passed by the city of Albuquerque, but don't quote me on anything more specific than that it involved at least part of the state of NM - and that NAMI was advocating FOR the passage of the law. Yes, NAMI really WAS doing such advocacy and no that's not the only time I've personally had to really and truly question what NAMI's agenda might be. As to where the other such laws are exactly, I don't know. I just know they're out there and that scares the snot out of me. After my childhood I can easily see - and agree with - forcibly medicating, even institutionalizing if necessary, someone who's unable to keep enough control of themself to quit endangering the safety of others (and also, I suppose the safety of themself). But to forcibly medicate or instituationalize all of us, when the biggest way we're threats is that we seldom easily fit into forced standards where "standards" are so rigid what's clearly desired comes closer to a colony of clones than a town or workplace full of individuals - and not because we do anything bad, but because we may have tendencies to odd sleep patterns or chafe at the thought of day #364 of grey polyester. Something is wrong when they try to stretch forced medication all the way to forcibly medicating all of us "just because" or "just in case".
|
|
|
|