|
wolfvanzandt -> RE: Masturbation - One Stop Thread (8/30/2005 6:10:36 PM)
|
quote:
Hey - I have no intention of name calling. That was a forestallment. I've had that reaction before and I wanted to explain why it didn't apply here before it happened. quote:
However, inferring that someone was 'ignorant' was just as unkind: I don't understand this one. "Ignorance" is a lack of knowledge. I have a lot of areas of ignorance and having them pointed out is not something that I consider "unkind" unless it's an area that I am supposed to be well versed in and done in the spirit of maliciousness. The particular case, though, was somewhat a challenge. I find that a very large number of Christians have very strong opinions with little basis and when they are pointed toward information that tends to not support their opinon, they don't want to see it. That is self inforced ignorance (if there is enough interest to have a strong opinion - otherwise, it's just a point of diinterest) and is rather a shame for Christians. I gave three options - I'm not sure if there are any others or not. Just off the bat, I don't see any. You should take whichever option fits you. As for the last option, if you choose to remain ignorant (instead of looking up the research) then, that's all right, but you really shouldn't be stating a strong opinion. quote:
What exactly is the proof that you looking for? Hmmmmm.....I'm not sure how to answer this one. I think I've found all the information I need to make a reasonable, Christian decision. The Bible isn't doesn't comdemn masturbation even when it speak of it and there's plenty of evidence of it's beneficial effects (and no evidence of negative effects). quote:
See, I believe that without the Anti-masturbator's whole mindset of understanding sex & God's standards, Pro-masturbators (ie. you) won't understand our arguments. For, every argument that Anti-M's make is on the basis of our mindset. It's not reasonable to base a belief on a mindset. especially one that you try to pursuade others of. That's pretty much saying, "I believe this and you should too - although I don't have any basis for that belief except that I believe it really strongly." But it's not like such a "mindset" is a necessaily Christian mindset. In other words, there are plenty of pagans that believe that masturbation is wrong or harmful. On the otherhand, as is obvious from this thread, there are, at least nominal (I realize that you don't know me well enough to tell if I'm "really" a Christian or not) Christians that believe that there is nothing wrong and even plenty right about masturbation. quote:
So- I would like to take this subject past judging the correctness of our arguments - and go deeper into understanding the mindsets that leads us towards our opposing oppinions & interpretations on this subject. Well, I have commented on that. When you negate the correctness of arguments and assumptions, you end up with psychological factors. The strongest that I can see working here is culture. It is hard to distinguish between ones own culture and reasonable beliefs simply because cultural assuptions are taken for granted for so long. One of the serious problems I see in the church is a ready willingness to accept traditional beliefs uncritically - and by "uncritically" I mean comparison with the scriptures as much as I do with empirical data. quote:
In John Piper's first sermon (click here to listen) he takes the text of Ezekial 16:4-63, to proove that this picture of sex (between a husband and wife), is a picture discribing the relationship between God ("I") and his people ("faithless wife"). And, in this powerful portrayal of God's intimate love with his people, there is no room for a depiction of God loving himself (or masturbating) in the same sexual terms. The problem (and it's a serious problem) is that this is a Biblical allegory intended to emphasize the faithfulness of God to a faithless people. Beyond that context you cannot use it. It is not intended to be a commennt of sexual hygiene or even the correctness of sexual practices. It is a dismally common prcatice in the church to take scripture out of context to support poorly based beliefs. THat can be used to provide "support" for just about any belief one could come up with. quote:
Our sexual pratices should reflect what God himself practices. God's most intimate love (likened unto sex) is always shared with others- and never is directed toward himself. The fallacy here is that God does not practice any kind of sex at all (unless, as some Christians believe, God had a carnal relationship with Mary through a surrogate body). Therefore, even marital sex does not reflect what God Himself practices. quote:
In the same way, our most intimate expression of love (sex), should also be shared solely with a covenant partner, not directed at ourselves (as in the case of masturbation or solo sex). And, of course, I don't at all see masturbation as an intimate expression of love. It's simply a maintenance mechanism. I suspect that in very few cases (and I beleive they would truely be aberrant) is masturbation an expression of "self-love". quote:
You never see God's love seeking to directly please himself. God's Love always is self-less, is never directed at himself, and, it's tottally other minded, and other centered. Again, masturbation and love are unrelated. As it is, though, the Bible repeats over and over - Old Testament and New - that God acts to glorify Himself. Of course, when God is glorified, His people are also glorified, therefore, it would be much too simplistic to call God selfish because of that. quote:
And, you can't understand where my comments are comming from, without hearing or reading Rev. John Piper's message. I will look at Rev. Piper's site, but his argument doesn't sound, from what you've said, to be any different from the typical anti-masturbation stance.
|
|
|
|