|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:02:28 PM
|
|
|
crankius
Posts: 4651
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Piff. essentially, is this a thread full of orthodox Christians discussing Mormon doctrines? There are exmormons who visit the thread quite often. And if you read the thread carefully, you will see lots of quotes and links directly to mormon theology/quotes from mormon books, teachings, prophets, etc. It is not anyone's intention to spread false information about mormonism, but rather to discuss the actual differences between mormonism and Biblical Christianity.
_____________________________
Do not be overly righteous, Nor be overly wise: Why should you destroy yourself? Ecclesiastes 7:16 SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:04:07 PM
|
|
|
Piff.
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/24/2008
Status: offline
|
i see... there's just a ton of posts in this thread... haven't had a chance to read through them all and was just wondering what the deal was with this thread.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:04:21 PM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6429
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Piff. just out of curiousity, how many of these ideas and notions discussed in this thread are actually from the mouth (err, fingers) or a practicing Mormon? essentially, is this a thread full of orthodox Christians discussing Mormon doctrines? If you read through the thread, you'll find a few that have been freed from the cult and others that have had extended encounters with Mormons. One or two practicing Mormons have participated too. There may have been one or two that have only read about the perncious doctrines. So it's a mixed bag. Where do YOU fit in these different groups?
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:30:42 PM
|
|
|
Piff.
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/24/2008
Status: offline
|
Where do YOU fit in these different groups? what a very direct question, and interesting the emphasis you placed on the word "you". is this an attempt to "smoke out" any mormons in hiding? i am christian, thank you very much. honestly, i dont see the point in me identifying myself in terms of presonal beliefs... what if i was mormon, would that automatically discredit my opinion... would you treat me differently? i must say, it's quite revealing that the first question you have posed to me is to basically state my religions affiliation.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:32:36 PM
|
|
|
davemiller7
Posts: 1085
Joined: 3/5/2008
From: NC via NY
Status: offline
|
Sorry, God may have spoken through Melchezidek to Abraham, but that is far different from Melchezidek being "the preincarnate Jesus." Melchizedek was a human, king of Salem, and a priest, not The Christ. Gen 14:18 Then Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine. He was priest of God Most High, (NIV) -Dave quote:
ORIGINAL: cybrjewls Greetings! It is written in Hebrews regarding how Jesus is High Priest Forever according to the order of Melchezidek. Which means that Melchezidek ordered it to be so; therefore it must have been Christ Jesus as well for Only The Father Could Order Such a Fulfillment Prophecy as thus who was indwelling the Son of Man directly. No one knows The Father except The Son, and no one knows The Son of Man except The Father; and those to whom HE chooses to reveal. For instance, the Desolation Decrees in revelation are By The Order of God Most High; himself; written for us to take warning ahead of time! The Disciples did not recognize His ascended form from hades return to earth although their hearts were burning when He Spoke to them. The Romans and the Sanhedrin could not recognize Him for He could walk right through them if it Was The Father's Will. Christ can take on any personal traits; for it is written: you have done this to Me, when you did it to someone else. Especially regarding those of The Holy Faith in Christ Jesus. Christ is One With The Father in Heaven as written and, therefore, OmniPresent ideas should Present themselves..... Where Christ is still present over hades in the parable of the rich man and lazarus as written and can be communcated with. I Will Be With You, even to the end of age..... until the 'raptura' event into The Millennium and able to carry in on through Armageddon on to The Great And Terrible Day of The Lord before The Judgment Seat of He Who Reigns Most Highly Exalted Above All. quote:
ORIGINAL: harvesthoney quote:
ORIGINAL: cybrjewls Also, The Priest of Jerusalem called Melchezidek was, in fact the 'preincarnate' Jesus; is my understanding as well. For it is also written how God spoke with Abraham directly concerning Soddom and Gammorah. I'm confused..."The Priest of Jerusalem called Melchezidek was, in fact the 'preincarnate' Jesus;" Who teaches this???
_____________________________
-Dave The Prayer of Protection The light of God surrounds me, The love of God enfolds me, The power of God protects me, The presence of God watches over me. Wherever I am, God is.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:39:19 PM
|
|
|
Fritzpw_Admin
Posts: 7713
Joined: 2/28/2005
From: New Jersey
Status: online
|
Melchizedek isn't the topic for this thread. Please continue that discussion in a different thread. Thanks!
_____________________________
Fritz Senior Manager of Social Media fritz@salemwebnetwork.com Want to see my latest online project? Check out http://budurl.com/CWonFacebook
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:42:18 PM
|
|
|
davemiller7
Posts: 1085
Joined: 3/5/2008
From: NC via NY
Status: offline
|
Thanx for the supporting resources to my statements. -Dave quote:
ORIGINAL: crankius Here is a collection of helpful quotes on what mormonism teaches about the birth of Jesus. After they list the many quotes, they conclude: quote:
You might ask, "How can Mormons say that Christ was born of a virgin when leaders have consistently described an act common to the reproductive process?" This is accomplished by changing the definition of the word virgin. Since Mormonism teaches Mary did not have sexual relations with a mortal man, but instead was impregnated by an immortal man, some Mormons feel that they can still use the phrase virgin birth. As Bruce McConkie said, "For our present purposes, suffice it to say that our Lord was born of a virgin, which is fitting and proper, and also natural, since the Father of the Child was an immortal Being." (The Promised Messiah, p. 466; emphasis added) "Our Lord is the only mortal person ever born to a virgin, because he is the only person who ever had an immortal Father." (Mormon Doctrine, 2nd ed., p. 822; emphasis added) "Mary was a virgin... until after the birth of our Lord. Then, for the first time, she was known by Joseph, her husband; and other children, both sons and daughters, were then born to her. (Matt. 13:55-56; Mark 6:3; Gal. 1:19.) She conceived and brought forth her Firstborn Son while yet a virgin because the Father of that child was an immortal personage." (Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, vol. 1, p. 82; emphasis added) As president Joseph F. Smith said, "Mary, the virgin girl, who had never known mortal man, was his mother." (Box Elder Stake conference of December 20, 1914; emphasis added) When one considers that the LDS Church also teaches that every human born on earth is a literal child of God, the above quotes become even more blasphemous. Mormon leaders have maintained that all humans, Mary included, were born first in a spiritual state known as the pre-existence. If Mormon leaders are telling the truth when they say that God physically impregnated Mary, then we have no other recourse than to assume the Jesus of Mormonism was created by way of an incestuous relationship.
_____________________________
-Dave The Prayer of Protection The light of God surrounds me, The love of God enfolds me, The power of God protects me, The presence of God watches over me. Wherever I am, God is.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:43:11 PM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6429
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Piff. Where do YOU fit in these different groups? what a very direct question, and interesting the emphasis you placed on the word "you". is this an attempt to "smoke out" any mormons in hiding? i am christian, thank you very much. honestly, i dont see the point in me identifying myself in terms of presonal beliefs... what if i was mormon, would that automatically discredit my opinion... would you treat me differently? i must say, it's quite revealing that the first question you have posed to me is to basically state my religions affiliation. Why do direct questions offend you like that? I thought your opening post was direct enough. If you were a Mormon or consider Mormons to be a legitimate Christian sect, it would become obvious soon enough. I just thought it'd save us some time, since you aren't willing to read the thread - which I don't really blame you. And, yes, if you admitted to being a Mormon, I'd automatically dismiss most of your opinions because I've had more than 30 years interacting with Mormons and consider their doctrines among the worst in perverting the gospel of Jesus Christ and a lot of their pretense at superior morality to be, at least in part, just PR. Besides, you wrote in another thread: quote:
Also, I would appreciate it if in the future, rather than trying to coerce me to state an opinion or stance, if you would merely ask me directly for clarification on my posts or statements. I'm a pretty open guy.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 12:51:57 PM
|
|
|
Piff.
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/24/2008
Status: offline
|
correct, i did state as such. it should be noted, the reponse i gave in a previous thread was in response to being asked to interpret a scripture for the purposes of, again, identifying my religious affiliation. however, i wasn't offended by a direct question nor was i offended in general... i merely made a behaviorial observation based on the fact that i was immediately asked to identify myself after making an initial post in this thread. i hope you can see the difference or atleast what it is i'm getting at.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:10:36 PM
|
|
|
cybrjewls
Posts: 1173
Status: offline
|
Greetings! Faith without Works is to be separated from Jesus for Jesus said apart from Me you can do nothing (LOL!), for Faith without Works is second death is written! For God Is The God of The Living and not of the dead. For We are found alive in Christ who Is The Life and through whom all things have their being. Therefore, The Work of God is this: to believe in the One that HE Sent. Anyone who believes in Me and Remains in Me said Jesus, will be doing as I have Done in that they are careful to keep My Commandments. Jesus said that there is nothing hidden in the darkness that will not be brought out into the light on the Day Of Judgment as written. God Will Reveal even those secret things on that day and expose the motives of people and will reward each according to what they have done; whether it be Good or Evil. If a person will not Work, they will not eat is written. The workers deserve their wages is written, away from me you doers of iniquity is written. Wheat and tares is written. Sheep and goats is written. Therefore, Judge nothing before the appointed time is written. God Will Expose falsehood is written. Who are you to judge Someone else's Servants is written. They stand or fall to The Master is written. For The Master is able to make them stand is written. Spreading false lies about other people is worthless gossip and faultfinding which is written regarding busybodies. Blessed are they that are so treated because of Jesus is written; for their rewards are great is written. Knowledge was nothing to Paul is written; add to Faith knowledge OF (from) God is written. quote:
ORIGINAL: JimboFletch quote:
ORIGINAL: cybrjewls Jesus said I condemn no one, I Judge only as I Hear. Jesus said not to condemn lest you too be condemned. If you believe that then you do not understand scripture or how to handle it, much less how teach it. Jesus clearly taught that we are to discern and expose the wicked and perverters of the Gospel. Nowhere does He tell us to accept those that change the Gospel of Grace purchased by His precious blood into a religion of works that replaces His redemption.
< Message edited by cybrjewls -- 7/29/2008 3:30:53 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:14:14 PM
|
|
|
landabee
Posts: 2760
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Central Florida
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Piff. just out of curiosity, how many of these ideas and notions discussed in this thread are actually from the mouth (err, fingers) or a practicing Mormon? essentially, is this a thread full of orthodox Christians discussing Mormon doctrines? Welcome to the forums. Your curiosity can be put to rest by reading the whole thread. It addresses many differences between mormonism and Christianity. At the moment, the thread has one professing mormonism participating. The rest of us are Christians of various mainstream, mostly Protestant denominations. Much earlier in the thread there have been other mormons discussing their belief system. Once you have read the thread, you will see that dialogue has been presented by Christians against the false teachings of mormonism. Scriptural support of our beliefs have been provided. It isn't merely opinion, or feeling or even a "burning bosom testimony". It is the Word of God. Why do you ask?
_____________________________
"Sound theology discourages ignorance instead of promoting it." ~ CourdeLeon
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:17:40 PM
|
|
|
crankius
Posts: 4651
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Spreading false lies about other people is worthless gossip and faultfinding which is written regarding busybodies. Blessed are they that are so treated because of Jesus is written; for their rewards are great is written. Knowledge was nothing to Paul is written; add to Faith knowledge OF (from) God is written. Exposing and condemning false doctrine is a far cry from spreading false lies, gossiping, and faultfinding. If you are unhappy with the content of this thread, perhaps this isn't the thread for you.
_____________________________
Do not be overly righteous, Nor be overly wise: Why should you destroy yourself? Ecclesiastes 7:16 SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:19:27 PM
|
|
|
cybrjewls
Posts: 1173
Status: offline
|
That we may be one through Christ is written, as also included in a relationship with God. Jesus said that no one believes His Testimony. Yet it is written in Hebrews regarding how The Son of Man is 'superior' to angels. Why would the writer have such excellent teaching and then compare the Son regarding angels? Yet, it is written! Therefore, lucifer is a spirit being as written. When he was created in our accounting for time periods is written that he was a murderer from the beginning. Therefore, in Genesis it is written 'in the beginning God created the Heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and void and The Spirit of God Hovered over the face of the deep.' ' And God Said 'Let there Be Light, and the Light was separated from the darkness.' Was The Spirit of God keeping the deep down to start with or was lucifer fell right away as darkness? Therfore, lucifer was an annointed angel of God and 'brother' by the Spirit of God at one time in accordance with what one of the Mormon 'teachings' proposes. The devil is not a central Doctrine to The Christian Faith. So can it be for us, if we do not take warning lest we fall as written in Paul. If Spirit beings were kept in dark chains reserved for the punishment to come and banished from the upper heavenly realms as written in revelation, then how will we escape if We ignore such a Great Salvation? For Jesus said 'see I have left a door open for you in Heaven above that no one can shut' For I hold the keys of hades and The Kingdom is written. Therefore Jesus said regarding the yeast of the pharisees, you shut the kingdom of heaven in peoples faces and do not do anything to enter to gain honor from God yourselves. Jesus said the devil has asked for you to be sifted, but I have prayed for you. And when you turn back strengthen your brethern. Jesus has special standing With God, we see, and the devil has some standing, also, at times. For God Loves His Creation and His Enemies as He has commanded Us to do also. quote:
ORIGINAL: davemiller7 Sorry, God may have spoken through Melchezidek to Abraham, but that is far different from Melchezidek being "the preincarnate Jesus." Melchizedek was a human, king of Salem, and a priest, not The Christ. Gen 14:18 Then Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine. He was priest of God Most High, (NIV) -Dave quote:
ORIGINAL: cybrjewls Greetings! It is written in Hebrews regarding how Jesus is High Priest Forever according to the order of Melchezidek. Which means that Melchezidek ordered it to be so; therefore it must have been Christ Jesus as well for Only The Father Could Order Such a Fulfillment Prophecy as thus who was indwelling the Son of Man directly. No one knows The Father except The Son, and no one knows The Son of Man except The Father; and those to whom HE chooses to reveal. For instance, the Desolation Decrees in revelation are By The Order of God Most High; himself; written for us to take warning ahead of time! The Disciples did not recognize His ascended form from hades return to earth although their hearts were burning when He Spoke to them. The Romans and the Sanhedrin could not recognize Him for He could walk right through them if it Was The Father's Will. Christ can take on any personal traits; for it is written: you have done this to Me, when you did it to someone else. Especially regarding those of The Holy Faith in Christ Jesus. Christ is One With The Father in Heaven as written and, therefore, OmniPresent ideas should Present themselves..... Where Christ is still present over hades in the parable of the rich man and lazarus as written and can be communcated with. I Will Be With You, even to the end of age..... until the 'raptura' event into The Millennium and able to carry in on through Armageddon on to The Great And Terrible Day of The Lord before The Judgment Seat of He Who Reigns Most Highly Exalted Above All. quote:
ORIGINAL: harvesthoney quote:
ORIGINAL: cybrjewls Also, The Priest of Jerusalem called Melchezidek was, in fact the 'preincarnate' Jesus; is my understanding as well. For it is also written how God spoke with Abraham directly concerning Soddom and Gammorah. I'm confused..."The Priest of Jerusalem called Melchezidek was, in fact the 'preincarnate' Jesus;" Who teaches this???
< Message edited by cybrjewls -- 7/29/2008 3:37:54 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:23:05 PM
|
|
|
landabee
Posts: 2760
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Central Florida
Status: offline
|
Um.....cybrjewls.... TOPIC, please. Please, please, please???? Thank you. Mormonism is a false religion with false doctrines and we are to be as the Bereans. So, to make it easier for you, cybrjewls....try a simple answer: Do you feel that mormonism is heresy? There, a simple yes or no will suffice.
_____________________________
"Sound theology discourages ignorance instead of promoting it." ~ CourdeLeon
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:23:59 PM
|
|
|
Piff.
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/24/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
Welcome to the forums. Your curiosity can be put to rest by reading the whole thread. It addresses many differences between mormonism and Christianity. At the moment, the thread has one professing mormonism participating. The rest of us are Christians of various mainstream, mostly Protestant denominations. Much earlier in the thread there have been other mormons discussing their belief system. Once you have read the thread, you will see that dialogue has been presented by Christians against the false teachings of mormonism. Scriptural support of our beliefs have been provided. It isn't merely opinion, or feeling or even a "burning bosom testimony". It is the Word of God. Why do you ask? Thanks for the welcome. I ask simply because i enjoy reading about other religious beliefs and things of that nature, i believe it not only increases my own personal testimony of Jesus Christ but also helps me solidify my beliefs. However, I'd rather not wade the fodder in this thread if it is either composed of one-sided discussion or over-aggresive debate. does that make sense? If there is truly discussion of worth in this thread then I will gladly take the take to look thru this 66 page thread. however, if it merely is just one group of people commenting on how "untrue" a specific group of people's beliefs are, then i'm not so interested.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:39:18 PM
|
|
|
landabee
Posts: 2760
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Central Florida
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Piff. correct, i did state as such. it should be noted, the reponse i gave in a previous thread was in response to being asked to interpret a scripture for the purposes of, again, identifying my religious affiliation. however, i wasn't offended by a direct question nor was i offended in general... i merely made a behaviorial observation based on the fact that i was immediately asked to identify myself after making an initial post in this thread. Romans 1:16: For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
_____________________________
"Sound theology discourages ignorance instead of promoting it." ~ CourdeLeon
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:50:16 PM
|
|
|
Piff.
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/24/2008
Status: offline
|
not to contribute to the topic deviation but... if the purpose of the above scripture is to allude to the possibility of me being "ashamed" or unwilling to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ as my savior and redeemer... then it is done so under unwarranted pretenses. upon being asked, i proclaimed myself a follower of Christ (post #1629) without hesitation. however, the posts i made following that one pertain to the notion that in order for my comments to have meaning or to possibly be respected were subject to the beliefs which i subscribed to... this idea was confirmed to be true of jimbofletch. which personally, i feel to be troubling and i dont feel there should be a criteria for a person's opinion to be of worth or even valid. but that's just me.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 1:52:29 PM
|
|
|
Fritzpw_Admin
Posts: 7713
Joined: 2/28/2005
From: New Jersey
Status: online
|
cybrjewls, you are off-topic. Get on the topic please or refrain from participating in the thread. Please do not reply to this message within the Community. Please email Community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments, or concerns. Please do not send me PMs regarding this message. Messages which disregard the words in red will be removed without warning and the poster may also be banned.
_____________________________
Fritz Senior Manager of Social Media fritz@salemwebnetwork.com Want to see my latest online project? Check out http://budurl.com/CWonFacebook
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 2:01:00 PM
|
|
|
davemiller7
Posts: 1085
Joined: 3/5/2008
From: NC via NY
Status: offline
|
Fritz, Melchizedek is being discussed because he is/was (?) an essential part of the Mormon faith. It is the Melchizedek Priesthood that all Mormon men attain if they are good Mormons. That's why it was being discussed. -Dave quote:
ORIGINAL: Fritzpw_Admin Melchizedek isn't the topic for this thread. Please continue that discussion in a different thread. Thanks!
_____________________________
-Dave The Prayer of Protection The light of God surrounds me, The love of God enfolds me, The power of God protects me, The presence of God watches over me. Wherever I am, God is.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 2:01:13 PM
|
|
|
Piff.
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/24/2008
Status: offline
|
understood. my use of the word "worth" was merely confined to the purposes of discussion, not of worth in general. if you would like to get into docrtine and things of that nature, by all means... start another thread.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 2:05:41 PM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6429
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Piff. ...however, the posts i made following that one pertain to the notion that in order for my comments to have meaning or to possibly be respected were subject to the beliefs which i subscribed to... this idea was confirmed to be true of jimbofletch. which personally, i feel to be troubling and i dont feel there should be a criteria for a person's opinion to be of worth or even valid. but that's just me. No offense intended, it's just that I believe there are certain opinions of certain groups that automatically disqualify themselves as having no eternal worth or validity. To name only two, in addition to Mormonism: Jehovah's Witnesses and Branch Davidians. There should be no question that those are outside biblical and historical Christianity and they worship a god not found in the Bible. But that's just me. Some people are willing to entertain any new or strange doctrine that's foreign to orthodox Chrsitianity.
|
|
|
|
RE: Mormonism? - 7/29/2008 2:07:28 PM
|
|
|
Piff.
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/24/2008
Status: offline
|
honestly... no, not at this point. i initially posted in this thead because it seemed like there might some good stuff in here, after the first page of reading i wasnt so sure... so i posed a question about the content of this thread (it is a very long thread) for my benefit, as i haven't been following the thread since it originated. from there, i've kind of meandered from point to point...
|
|
|
|
|