Youthworker Journal Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Ministry Leaders Folder

Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
  Sponsor

RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatically incorrect, annoying phrases

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Miscellaneous Topics >> RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatically incorrect, annoying phrases
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/4/2008 12:06:43 PM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
Yeah, you have to stop the sound (without breathing) between those two words when singing and keep your diction clear. There are lots of those in singing. You almost always have to stop the sound before "you" or it will come out funny.

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 101
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/4/2008 12:12:40 PM   
i_am_just_me


Posts: 494
Joined: 12/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HisCovenant

Yeah, you have to stop the sound (without breathing) between those two words when singing and keep your diction clear. There are lots of those in singing. You almost always have to stop the sound before "you" or it will come out funny.


Whew! I am glad that someone knew what I was talking about! I really don't know why that drives me so crazy, but I will actually not like a song, just because of that!

_____________________________

- Lynn

Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting. - John Russell

* * * * * * *
Post #: 102
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/4/2008 12:25:28 PM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
It's a more advanced singing technique. I think most people know what you mean (have heard singers say something funny,) although they may not know how to correct it. I classically trained for years and have just figured out the rule in the last year of so.

Most singers are taught to string all their words together, hooking ending consonants to beginning sounds, but that doesn't always work well- namely when the second word begin with a vowel. Then it just sounds like a different word. I had a Minister of Music aquaintance that said when the congregation sang "Lead On O King Eternal" that it sounded like "Lead on O Kinky Turtle."

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 103
[Deleted] - 2/4/2008 12:41:57 PM   
Deleted User
[Deleted by Admins]
  Post #: 104
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/4/2008 1:06:46 PM   
i_am_just_me


Posts: 494
Joined: 12/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: whodeeni


ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!


ME TOO!!!

_____________________________

- Lynn

Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting. - John Russell

* * * * * * *
Post #: 105
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/4/2008 1:23:27 PM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4974
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HisCovenant

It's a more advanced singing technique. I think most people know what you mean (have heard singers say something funny,) although they may not know how to correct it. I classically trained for years and have just figured out the rule in the last year of so.

Most singers are taught to string all their words together, hooking ending consonants to beginning sounds, but that doesn't always work well- namely when the second word begin with a vowel. Then it just sounds like a different word. I had a Minister of Music aquaintance that said when the congregation sang "Lead On O King Eternal" that it sounded like "Lead on O Kinky Turtle."


I remember our choir director telling us about a song he directed once with a line that said, "Jesus gives me help". He said he had to work hard to get the choir members to put the "p" on the end loud enough so that people could actually hear it!

< Message edited by Consecrated2God -- 2/4/2008 2:04:22 PM >


_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 106
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/4/2008 1:26:38 PM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
Our Choir Director is always harping on "V's" and "D's."

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 107
[Deleted] - 2/4/2008 1:56:26 PM   
Deleted User
[Deleted by Admins]
  Post #: 108
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/4/2008 3:53:15 PM   
utilityfielder


Posts: 12350
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Home of the Champions
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: whodeeni

For the longest time I thought that song "Beauty for Ashes"
was

Beautiful Rashes



as sung be a dermatologist.

_____________________________

Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement. Ronald Reagan
Post #: 109
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/5/2008 9:33:37 AM   
momof4

 

Posts: 149
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: an urban paradise!
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zoebob

I don't know how "new" it is, but I hate when people say "I called in to work because I was sick" Maybe it's a regional thing because the first few jobs I had in the area where I grew up that was called "calling out" not "calling in" because you were going to be OUT of work that day

ETA: The person that came in to replace the person who was scheduled to be there was "called in"


I have always "called in" when reporting that I would not be there due to illness. I don't know why you would call "out". You are calling "in" to your work place or your school, from your home to inform them that you will not be "in" for work. If you get a call requesting to come to work to replace a co-worker, you are being "called in" . You are being requested to come in to work, so why wouldn't you be "called in"?

I have been in the workforce since 1972, and "calling in" was in common use back then. I don' think it is something new. Maybe it's regional.
Post #: 110
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/5/2008 9:39:00 AM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
In that case isn't "calling in" referring to the phone call and not the lack of work? "As in, I called in the winning answer at the radio station."

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 111
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/5/2008 9:43:35 AM   
zoebob


Posts: 8756
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: land of limbo
Status: online
Well, mostly from the position of someone at the job already, if someone calls to say they won't be at work then they have "called out" They called to say they would be out of work. If we call someone and say "John can't be here today can you come to work" we have "called them in" However, even when talking to people we would say "Why did you call out yesterday?" etc. Or, sometimes when I'd come in we'd be told "It's goign to be a long day because we had 3 call outs" It must be a regional thing.

_____________________________

L-R: DD1, Ellies DS2, DD2, Ellies DS1
L-R: Ellies DD1, Ellies DD2, DS, Ellies DS3
Post #: 112
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/5/2008 10:05:37 AM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
I've never heard of a "call out." We would say "on sick leave" or "called in sick." (referring to the phone call coming into the building, not the person being a no show.) You're probably right- it's probably regional.

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 113
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/5/2008 12:03:39 PM   
IonMoon


Posts: 918
Joined: 4/21/2005
From: The Unted State of Confusion
Status: offline
I have always used "Called off sick." (and actually did the past two days and likely will at least one more!!). I have also heard called in sick, but never heard called "out."

I used to be a real stickler for grammar & "proper" speech... but I learned that the fact that it is an area in which I excel does not mean it is an area that is important in the grand scheme of things... There are a lot of other skills much more important in life.

For instance, my mechanically inclined friends don't expect me to know how to repair a motor... or care about how it is done. They don't think less of me because of it, either.

I think a lot of times we can miss the message when we are blinded by the insignificant details. We can learn something from everyone we meet, however they say it, if we aren't too arrogant to listen.

My biggest peeve now, is when people misuse something while sure they are correct in an attempt to sound superior (there are actually some examples in this thread, but I will use one from real life). I had a college professor who went into a long tirade (at least 20 min!) about how people do not properly pronunciate words and it makes them appear ignorant. Unfortunately, she kept saying, proNOUNciate." It took ALL my energy to not ROFL!

Some of what I have seen in this thread as being called "new" I have heard forever... and some of the things I have seen listed as being wrong are not.

And I wanted to point out that for "irregardless" the definition posted said clearly "nonstandard." Lots of terms (ain't, etc) are in the dictionary, it does not make it correct- if it says colloquial, nonstandard, slang, etc. it is "improper" grammar.

Tara P

_____________________________

http://www.geocities.com/hallscola67/KyliesHomemadeShopIndex.htm
Post #: 114
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/5/2008 12:17:31 PM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rainbowtvp
My biggest peeve now, is when people misuse something while sure they are correct in an attempt to sound superior (there are actually some examples in this thread, but I will use one from real life).

I really hate when I realize I have been doing this, which is more often than I know. I am slowly learning to check things out before I start telling what's wrong with the way everyone else speaks... and to not be such a stickler... like you said, in the grand scheme a lot of it really isn't that important. I'd rather spend my time fighting verbal problems like lying and gossip, but find myself caught up in semantics instead. It's frustrating.

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 115
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/12/2008 5:41:04 PM   
isaacsmom


Posts: 1978
Joined: 12/2/2005
Status: online
quote:

My own additions...

* Bad comma usage! (in professional works)
* to/two/too errors (in professional works)
* there/they're/ their errors (in prof. works)
* it's/its errors (prof. again)
* a singular noun followed by a plural pronoun (ie, Give your child what they want - YOU! -- that was from an actual flier from an argh!)
* when I have to write about myself in third person for uni (ie, the researcher discovered that... or, it is the opinion of the author that...)


I'm with you on these!!!!

quote:

When singers have the words "with you" in their songs, but say "whichoo"


I hate that!!! I cannot stand all of the improper grammar in today's popular music. It's ridiculous. For example, Fergie's new ballad . . . . she says "and I'm gonna miss you like a child misses their blanket . . . ."

I don't like dangling participles ("What'd you do that for?")

And people -- what has happened to adverbs?? Have they disappeared from our English language? No one uses them anymore! I hear more news reporters use adjectives in place of adverbs and it drives me up the wall!!! And our bank's new posters advertise "Real Banking. Real Fast" and also "Real Checking. Real Excited". SERIOUSLY!! WHO is their marketing company and they need to be fired!! One more and I'll quit . . . . the past two months I have been seeing a milk ad that features Glen Close. The headline of the ad says "Look Close". I know it's a play on words, but sheesh! It makes no sense!

Oh -- and I don't like it when I see people saying or writing "that" in place of "who" or "whom". Example: "I was taking coffee to someone that wasn't there".

Now how many grammatical errors did I make during my rant??

< Message edited by isaacsmom -- 2/12/2008 5:47:29 PM >


_____________________________

<<< My littlest punkin'
*~*~*Rachel*~*~*
pirtlefarm.blogspot.com

Beware of posing as a profound person -- God became a baby. ~Oswald Chambers
Post #: 116
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 12:08:14 AM   
FoxInSox

 

Posts: 664
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: dallas
Status: offline
quote:

"and I'm gonna miss you like a child misses their blanket . . . ."



ooh, that one gets me too!


quote:

I don't like dangling participles ("What'd you do that for?")


me, too! (but i think that is "ending a sentence with a preposition. a dangling participle has to do with splitting up a participial verb used as an adjective) phrase).

on adverbs...DUDE...if it's describing a verb, it almost always has an "ly." so, for example, when speaking grammatically, we say, "don't take it personalLY," not, "don't take it personal."

lets add in "who" and "whom." whom is only used when who/whom is part of a prepositional phrase.

and, i'm probably driving someone crazy with my refusal to use caps today, lol

_____________________________

~ formerly infinitepiphany ~
Post #: 117
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 9:32:26 AM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
that would be me michelle at least you're using punctuation

I have a question. What is this use of *asterisks* that I am seeing all over the forum all about? I get that they are trying to set something apart, but is this a new accepted practice? Or do people just think they're cuter than quotation marks? I agree they are cuter, but... really... what's up with that?

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 118
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 11:07:17 AM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4974
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: offline
I've done that a couple of times to reflect a certain inflection in my voice that I just couldn't express using quote marks or italics.

_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 119
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 2:12:37 PM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
So it means you're mad? What type of inflection?

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 120
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 5:26:35 PM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4974
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: offline
No, not mad, just wanted to emphasize it in a certain way, with a slight pause before the word. It's hard to explain and I can't even think of an example at the moment, but I know I've done it in the past. Not very often, though. Not even often enough to remember exactly what I did and why! Lol!

_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 121
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 5:29:44 PM   
i_am_just_me


Posts: 494
Joined: 12/20/2007
Status: offline
I've done it before too....*shrugs* don't know why

I always thought that * is used to explain a non-verbal action

_____________________________

- Lynn

Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting. - John Russell

* * * * * * *
Post #: 122
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 5:31:39 PM   
Consecrated2God


Posts: 4974
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: Formerly Jesus Land
Status: offline
I always use these: <> for non-verbal actions. <looks at clock and realizes it's time to leave for church>

_____________________________

<--Plantation house in Louisiana
Post #: 123
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 5:35:54 PM   
HisCovenant


Posts: 4291
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
<> are for non verbal actions. You see that in plays.

I've only seen an astrisk used as a reference mark for a notation, like a footnote. I've never seen it used in any other way except on this forum... that's why I don't grasp what's being communicated by using it.

_____________________________

-HisCovenant/ Zipporah

My friends call me Zippy!
Post #: 124
RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatica... - 2/13/2008 5:43:16 PM   
i_am_just_me


Posts: 494
Joined: 12/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HisCovenant

<> are for non verbal actions. You see that in plays.

I've only seen an astrisk used as a reference mark for a notation, like a footnote. I've never seen it used in any other way except on this forum... that's why I don't grasp what's being communicated by using it.


I guess this forum is where I picked it up from
I have seen it before but couldnt say where, but I know that I have seen it used here

_____________________________

- Lynn

Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting. - John Russell

* * * * * * *
Post #: 125
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> Miscellaneous Topics >> RE: Recently introduced, overused, sometimes grammatically incorrect, annoying phrases
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Youthworker Journal Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Ministry Leaders Folder

Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

Faith Community Network is a proud member of the Salem Web Network of sites including:

CCMmagazine.com | ChristianJobs.com | ChurchStaffing.com | Crosscards.com | CrossDaily.com | Crosswalk.com | LightSource.com | OnePlace.com | SermonSearch.com | TheFish.com | XulonPress.com | YouthWorkerJournal.com
Enjoy the websites of these Faith Community Network Sponsors:

ChristianBook.com | EHarmony.com | Gospel for Asia | LifewayStores.com | Campus Crusade for Christ | Trinity College and Seminary | Townhall.com |