|
hoodleehoo -> RE: Reading Job, 2 huge questions (1/29/2008 12:52:27 PM)
|
Point 1 This is probably controversial, but many scholars believe Job to not be a historical account. It's not written in the format of a historical account, it's written in the format of a fictional story used to illustrate a point. For example, say someone in the future found a story from the 1900's. It starts with "Once apon a time" and ends with "and they lived happily ever after". Most likely, it's not a true historical account, but rather a fairy tale. It's a similar situation with some stories in the Old Testament. The creation story, Noah, Job, and Jonah are the ones I know for sure many scholars feel this away about. Point 2 There are several stories in the OT that actually come from Mesopatamian/Sumarian culture which predate the Hebrew bible by at least 1000 years. It was common for cultures back then to change all of the previous religion's stories and illustrations to fit the new religion when they were taken over. For instance, the Sumarians had a creation story very similar to ours in that it started in a Garden and took 7 days to create, but the creator was a giant serpent/snake. It's possible that they took the basic story and changed the snake to the "bad guy" to make a point. It was a common practice for the old religion's gods to become demons in the new religions when a conversion took place. Also, in the Epic of Gilgamesh (sp?) which predates the Hebrew bible by 1000 years, there is a part of the story eerily similar to the first few chapters of Genesis. There's a garden, a tree of life, a snake that tempts them to partake of the fruit... There's also a story in Sumarian history (which might supposedly be a historical account, I'm not 100% sure) which is VERY similar to Noah and the flood. We know that the whole Earth didn't flood, but it is possible that a giant area was flooded. It seems very likely that the story of Noah was taken from the Sumarian culture and twisted to teach Jewish ideas. Scientifically speaking, it would be impossible to have every animal in an ark that big. There's a lot of problems with the story that scholars have difficulty solving when taking the stories literally. The first two chapters of Genesis conflict with each other as they give two different versions of the creation story. Most likely, they are from two different sources. Genesis is really a patchwork of information from I believe 4 different sources (I used to know them back in college, lol) so it gets pretty difficult. Point 3 Personally, it's difficult for me to believe that God would put Job through all of that just to prove a point (or settle a bet) to the devil. I think, but cannot say for sure, there is an old sumarian story about their god and demon that had a similar conversation and put a follower's faith to the test to show that he was not just being faithful because of prosperity. Too much smoke for me to believe there's no fire. Obviously, no one but God knows for sure what parts of the OT are literal and what parts, if any, aren't. It's up to us to choose what we believe. From the information scholars and historians have now, this seems to be the best answer at the moment.
|
|
|
|