|
solo_soprano22 -> RE: Homosexuality Article (10/5/2008 9:39:41 AM)
|
The "gay gene" is not the only thing that has a bearing in sexual orientation. [&:] Genetics isn't the only branch of biology that can help explain intrinsic SSA. I do agree with you Stellaluna; I do believe there's a such thing as being born gay, esp. due to a biological problem. But the way I think about it is, we can only see what sex someone is on the outside, and we humans don't know everything about sexuality. God knows what they are on the inside, even if we want physcially look and say they're "x" because they have "x's" sex organs. If God sees what's on the inside, and the inside is opposite of the outside, but this person knows the outside is wrong (and they are correct), is it still wrong for them to go with their inward sex and have the world see them as homosexual? Or, since humans can only see so much about this at the moment, is it just wrong because they're going against what organs they were born with? Their backwardness may not show up in genetic testing as well, but that doesn't mean they don't have a problem.... It means we don't know all that we can know. (But we do have other biological problemss that have made someone "gay," and once corrected they were straight.) I'd say it doesn't make it right for those born biologically gay to go with the same sex... but if they are truly (for example) male in a female body, then what IS wrong for them? I'd say it's correct to go with one's true gender, not their secondary sex organs.
|
|
|
|