RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Theology] >> Prophecy & End Times



Message


bob97 -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (5/31/2008 1:27:48 AM)

Thats the beauty of it Stromcrow, we just have to trust in the LORD.

Bob




Sinner-Saint -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (5/31/2008 7:17:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter
If I may be so bold as to "butt into another's conversation" as I've been accused of doing lately...

You have not been accused of butting in on another's conversation.

I on the other hand raised a complaint about how rude you had been to me and you in return are mute until making this offhand comment in return.

For the record, I said:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint
I do not come in to your conversations and say what you're posting is complete hogwash. I would appreciate it if you would do me the same favor.

This was a polite response pointing out how I thought you had been offensive to me in this post:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter
Oscar Meyer has a way with B-O-L-O-G-N-A! And, that's bologna, too!

Your biggest problem with this interpretation is this weird concept of "heaven" you have! "The Altar [is] (the second level of Heaven)?" What's your proof for THAT garbage? How many levels does "Heaven" have, anyway? AND, what proof do you have for that? What ARE the various levels? You know, Milton was not inspired! Nor was Bosch or Dante! Be VERY careful what source(s) you are taking for your theological belief system!

KISS (Keep It Simple, Saint!) is good advice. Theology should REFLECT the Scriptures, not force them into a mold!

You really should get a good handle on what "heaven" is before forming theology around your concept…I searched EVERY verse that contained one of these four, and NONE of these verses showed Scofield's idea of three heavens! (More to come....)

Let's go over your contentions here.

1. "Weird concept of Heaven." It is not weird if you ask the question from where in the Heavenly realm does God resurrect the Dead in Christ so that they can be with Jesus in Heaven if they're not already there with Him directly upon death as some people so popularly believe. My support for saying there is a different place for them is John 14:2-3; 1Co 15; and 1Th 4:16-7. This place is called Heaven by Jesus in the Olivet Discourse. I liken that place of keeping of the Dead in Christ as the first Heaven.

The other place revealed in Revelation is that the martyred Saints are kept apart from the Dead in Christ: they have their own special place beneath the Altar which is in the Temple where God sits.

You can be dismissive as much as you want to be and this message board can be pretty vicious with attacks at times, but the concept of layering for Heaven as it relates to the souls there is a valid concept. Just because it is not found in actual word does not invalidate it anymore than the concept of "Trinity" is an invalid concept based on word usage alone.

2. "The Altar [is] (the second level of Heaven)?" This you called garbage. Nice. Actually you didn't read what I wrote nor quoted it correctly although you did put quotation marks around it as if I said it. Nice again.

I never said the Altar was the second level of Heaven. I said eschatologically that the place where the martyred Saints were revealed to have been was a second level as distinct as the floors in building because they were BENEATH the Altar as it was revealed when the fifth Seal was broken and the floor of the Temple, which is as glass, became transparent to show what was beneath the Altar.

If being in the presence of God the Father as John was is the "third Heaven" then the level below that is the "second Heaven."

3. How many levels does Heaven have? Three.

First: Paradise where the Dead in Christ rest until Jesus calls them out: John 5:25.

Second: The level below the presence of God the Martyred Saints occupy until their number is complete.

Third: The presence of God the Father. The Great Multitude enjoy this after being delivered to there by Christ and which the Martyred Saints also enjoy it after the Two Witnesses are resurrected and raised up to God's dimension. They complete the number and the martyred Saints are then 'made alive.' Once this happens and only after it happens does John pronounce the First Resurrection has happened. All must be made alive in the presence of the Father for it to be complete.

4. "...what proof do you have for that?" 2Co 12:2. Paul says a man in Christ was caught up to the third Heaven. So what are the first two? I just answered that. The evidence is in the Olivet Discourse, the Gospel and the Epistles for the first level as I have drawn out the concept and Jesus reveals the second level through John to us in Revelation.

5. What ARE the various levels?
1. Paradise: the place where the Dead in Christ rest. More explanation for this realm of Heaven can be found in Luke 16.

2. The place underneath the Altar where the Martyred Saints wait.

3. The presence of God.

All the evidence for this is in the Bible. None of them however can found solely by word study. That is a red herring and a wild goose chase to explore the "Heavens" as it relates to the souls there after this world.

6. "You know, Milton was not inspired! Nor was Bosch or Dante! Be VERY careful what source(s) you are taking for your theological belief system!"
This has no bearing upon the concept I am expressing. Since my source IS the Bible, then I have also been careful. Thank-you for the advice, evidently it wasn't needed.

7. "KISS (Keep It Simple, Saint!) is good advice. Theology should REFLECT the Scriptures, not force them into a mold!"
This concept answers a question which pertains to eschatology. I have used Scripture to illuminate the idea and indeed it was the Scripture which first labeled the Heavens and not me. I have not forced anything, and again, your advice was already heeded and therefore not needed.

8. "You really should get a good handle on what "heaven" is before forming theology around your concept…I searched EVERY verse that contained one of these four, and NONE of these verses showed Scofield's idea of three heavens!"
Now you're just being patronizing.

I don't think I need any upbraiding by you on how I form my eschatology to answer a relevant question: from where do the Dead in Christ come to be with the Father? Why does Paul refer to a 'third Heaven?'

Furthermore, Scofield has no bearing whatsoever on this concept as I have not read him nor rely upon him in any way. He is as much a red herring as Milton and Dante were.

Good day sir and Shalom to you too.




Retrobyter -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/9/2008 1:35:11 AM)

Shalom, Sinner-Saint! Let's handle this one step at a time:

First, you said,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint
You have not been accused of butting in on another's conversation.

I on the other hand raised a complaint about how rude you had been to me and you in return are mute until making this offhand comment in return.

For the record, I said:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint
I do not come in to your conversations and say what you're posting is complete hogwash. I would appreciate it if you would do me the same favor.

This was a polite response pointing out how I thought you had been offensive to me in this post:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter
Oscar Meyer has a way with B-O-L-O-G-N-A! And, that's bologna, too!

Your biggest problem with this interpretation is this weird concept of "heaven" you have! "The Altar [is] (the second level of Heaven)?" What's your proof for THAT garbage? How many levels does "Heaven" have, anyway? AND, what proof do you have for that? What ARE the various levels? You know, Milton was not inspired! Nor was Bosch or Dante! Be VERY careful what source(s) you are taking for your theological belief system!

KISS (Keep It Simple, Saint!) is good advice. Theology should REFLECT the Scriptures, not force them into a mold!

You really should get a good handle on what "heaven" is before forming theology around your concept…I searched EVERY verse that contained one of these four, and NONE of these verses showed Scofield's idea of three heavens! (More to come....)



To that, I must apologize. You're right. I DID overstep good manners and treated you less than respectfully. I WAS rude. I take full responsibility for my actions and say, "I'm sorry for offending you." As merely an explanation (not an excuse), I DO get overly passionate about the things I believe, and particularly in this case, I did not treat you as I should have; being my brother in the Messiah, I should have treated you AS I would have the Messiah Yeshua` Himself, and I did not! I truly am sorry.[&o]

Then, you said,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint
Let's go over your contentions here.

1. "Weird concept of Heaven." It is not weird if you ask the question from where in the Heavenly realm does God resurrect the Dead in Christ so that they can be with Jesus in Heaven if they're not already there with Him directly upon death as some people so popularly believe. My support for saying there is a different place for them is John 14:2-3; 1Co 15; and 1Th 4:16-7. This place is called Heaven by Jesus in the Olivet Discourse. I liken that place of keeping of the Dead in Christ as the first Heaven.


Now, with all due and proper respect to you, my brother, I should like to ask, "HOW does Jesus call 'this place' 'Heaven' in the Olivet Discourse?"

As I have said, I've learned that "heaven" (Greek: ouranos) simply means "sky."

There are 7 verses in Matt. 24 and 25, 4 verses in Mark 13, and 3 verses in Luke 21 that even use the word! Because there are so few of them, let's look at each one:

Matt 24:29-36
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:
33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
KJV


Now, please allow me to show you how this passage changes with a simple substitution:

Matt 24:29-36
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from the sky (meteorites), and the powers of the skies shall be shaken (the weather shall be disrupted):
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in the sky: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of the sky with power and great glory. (where else do normal clouds exist but in the atmosphere?)
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of the sky to the other. (where else would the "winds" exist but in the atmosphere?)
32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:
33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
35 The sky and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. (It's much easier to see that the atmosphere will pass away with the earth than "God's abode" passing away!)
36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels from the sky, but my Father only.
KJV


Here are the last two from Matt. 25:

Matt 25:1
25:1 Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.
KJV


Matt 25:14
14 For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods.
KJV


Let's do it again for these two verses:

Matt 25:1
25:1 Then shall the kingdom from the sky be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.
KJV


Matt 25:14
14 For the kingdom from the sky is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods.
KJV


Now, here are Mark's verses:

Mark 13:25-32
25 And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.
26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.
28 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near:
29 So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.
30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.
31 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.
32 But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.
KJV


Let's do it again, this time with Mark:

Mark 13:25-32
25 And the stars of the sky shall fall, and the powers that are in the sky shall be shaken.
26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of the sky.
28 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near:
29 So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.
30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.
31 The sky and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.
32 But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in the sky, neither the Son, but the Father.
KJV


Can you see how the interpretation of these verses becomes much less strained and how they become much more mundane and intelligible? Such a substitution gives the passage a "reality check" and "brings it back down to earth!"

Lastly, here are Luke's verses:

Luke 21:11
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.
KJV

Luke 21:26
26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
KJV

Luke 21:33
33 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.
KJV


And one last time, the substitution:

Luke 21:11
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from the sky.
KJV

Luke 21:26
26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of the sky shall be shaken.
KJV

Luke 21:33
33 The sky and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.
KJV


We can do the same thing with John 14:2-3; 1Co 15; and 1Th 4:16-7, but I won't right now for time and space!

Got to get to bed for now, but I will write more later.

Retrobyter




Sinner-Saint -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/9/2008 7:40:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter
To that, I must apologize. You're right. I DID overstep good manners and treated you less than respectfully. I WAS rude. I take full responsibility for my actions and say, "I'm sorry for offending you." As merely an explanation (not an excuse), I DO get overly passionate about the things I believe, and particularly in this case, I did not treat you as I should have; being my brother in the Messiah, I should have treated you AS I would have the Messiah Yeshua` Himself, and I did not! I truly am sorry.

Thank-you. Now I feel like I have won a brother (Mt 18:15). I forgive you formerly here; indeed, I had already forgiven you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: RetrobyterCan you see how the interpretation of these verses becomes much less strained and how they become much more mundane and intelligible? Such a substitution gives the passage a "reality check" and "brings it back down to earth!"

Mundane, yes, intelligible, yes, less strained, yes, for some of the references like Mt 24:29 & 30. Those can be understood as being up in the sky.

However, it still does not address how "sky" is used in reference to the spiritual realm or dimension beyond this world (as much as the sky is above this earth) where the dead in Christ rest in verse 31 which is the key verse here.

Paradise, as conceptualized in Jesus' time was not up, but down. In reality, it is neither, but another dimension past this physical dimension of three axes of space and one of time.

Nor does a simple translation address how other realms of heaven might be done away with in their entirety in Mt 24:35 and 36 unless you want to say Angels and God reside in the sky on clouds - in which case, you'd have to wonder why airplanes haven't routinely bumped into them!

In fact, in both cases you cite in Mt 25, translating "heaven" as "sky" loses all the impact that a realm beyond this world invokes. Here, it makes it so mundane as to render the verse unintelligible and thus strains the whole notion of "heaven" as God's realm.

That is all I am saying. My differentiation between "heaven" goes past the commonly understood "sky" in the Greek. It is in direct answer to Paul's reference to someone who goes to the third heaven and seeks to answer from where do souls go to and come from when resurrected from the dead.

For those earth-bound people, Heaven truly would have been as remote to them as 5000 feet up would be. I like literal translations and applications where possible, but we should not be so literal in translation as to lose meaning altogether.




Retrobyter -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/12/2008 1:58:33 AM)

Shalom, Sinner-Saint!

Thank you for forgiving me. May God get all the glory!

Now, you said,
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint

... However, it still does not address how "sky" is used in reference to the spiritual realm or dimension beyond this world (as much as the sky is above this earth) where the dead in Christ rest in verse 31 which is the key verse here.

Paradise, as conceptualized in Jesus' time was not up, but down. In reality, it is neither, but another dimension past this physical dimension of three axes of space and one of time.

Nor does a simple translation address how other realms of heaven might be done away with in their entirety in Mt 24:35 and 36 unless you want to say Angels and God reside in the sky on clouds - in which case, you'd have to wonder why airplanes haven't routinely bumped into them!

In fact, in both cases you cite in Mt 25, translating "heaven" as "sky" loses all the impact that a realm beyond this world invokes. Here, it makes it so mundane as to render the verse unintelligible and thus strains the whole notion of "heaven" as God's realm.

That is all I am saying. My differentiation between "heaven" goes past the commonly understood "sky" in the Greek. It is in direct answer to Paul's reference to someone who goes to the third heaven and seeks to answer from where do souls go to and come from when resurrected from the dead.

For those earth-bound people, Heaven truly would have been as remote to them as 5000 feet up would be. I like literal translations and applications where possible, but we should not be so literal in translation as to lose meaning altogether.


Please allow me to start where it all started with me: II Cor. 12:1-5:

2 Cor 12:1-5
1 It is not expedient for me doubtless to glory. I will come to visions and revelations of the Lord.
2 I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the third heaven.
3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;)
4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.
5 Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory, but in mine infirmities.
KJV


Now, the Greek is this:

1 Kauchasthai dei ou sumferon men, eleusomai de eis optasias kai apokalupseis Kuriou.
2 Oida anthroopon en Christoo pro etoon dekatessaroon eite en soomati ouk oida eite ektos tou soomatos ouk oida, ho Theos oiden harpagenta ton toiouton heoos tritou ouranou.
3 Kai oida ton toiouton anthroopon eite en soomati eite chooris tou soomatos ouk oida, ho Theos oiden.
4 Hoti heerpagee eis ton paradeison kai eekousen arreeta reemata ha ouk exon anthroopoo laleesai.
5 Huper tou toioutou kaucheesomai huper de emautou ou kaucheesomai ei mee en tais asthreneiais.


In none of these verses is there a Greek word meaning "UP!" The Greek word translated "caught up" in the KJV is "harpagenta," a form of the root word "harpazoo," which means to "snatch" away or to "seize!" Now, hang on to that thought for a moment.

(2nd gear) First, we have a couple of facts: We as Christians have been taught that the "third heaven" is "God's abode." I don't know whether this is original with Dr. C. I. Scofield (probably not), but he at least PROPAGATED the teaching in his notes in the old Scofield Reference Bible, a KJV-based reference work, on page 1238.

(3rd gear) Thus, to say that Paul was "caught up" to "God's abode," employs an English word ("up") that was not there in the original language, and uses a form of circular reasoning. ('The "third heaven" is "God's abode" because "God's abode" is the "third heaven.' ???)

(4th gear) I believe God led me to see the obvious finally when He led me to II Peter 3:3-13:

2 Peter 3:3-13
3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,
12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
KJV


THERE are your "three heavens!" The sky with the first earth that passed away in the Global Flood of Noach's day is the first sky; the sky with the present earth that is destined for the Global Fire is the second sky; and the sky with the new earth wherein will dwell righteousness will be the third sky! Simple, no?

I don't know about you, but I'd rather believe Peter than any "Dr. C. I. Scofield" (or any other theologian who originated the idea that the "third heaven was God's abode").

Right?

Retrobyter




Sinner-Saint -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/12/2008 7:36:12 AM)

Again, I don't have a problem with "heaven" as anything above this earth: i.e. "sky."

Indeed, words can have more than one meaning in the Hebrew, and that Messianic Jews of 2000 years ago picked a Greek word to convey "heaven" as they did and yet it can mean more is not without precedent in their own language.

Without knowing all, we have a clue from Paul in a letter he wrote to the Corinthians where he plainly says: third heaven.

He uses this word loosely in conjunction with "paradise."

The process by which this man got there is described as being caught up.

The whole description is in context of receiving visions and revelations from God, and this person, not Paul - because he is not boasting of himself - heard things which at the time Paul had met him fourteen years ago, was not able to tell.

All I have done is to come up with a logical layering of the realm of the spiritual beyond this mortal world to ask: from where are the dead resurrected? To which, along with the revelation supplied by Jesus through John that there is a realm in the spiritual world reserved only for martyred Saints - not only allows me to answer from where the "dead in Christ" are raised from but also answers why Paul would say there are three "heavens" in another manner of speaking.

So to conclude, you can keep your definition. It works just fine aside from where the souls who have departed this world reside until such time as they are resurrected from the grave.

And your definitions do not refute mine. As a separate concept, they can co-exist just fine.

I am not going to change your mind, and you have not changed mine.

I suggest we drop this as it has been entirely played out and let the thread get back to its original theme: Is the Rapture Scriptural?




Retrobyter -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/12/2008 11:18:01 PM)

Shalom, Sinner-Saint.

Hmmm.... You have said,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint

Again, I don't have a problem with "heaven" as anything above this earth: i.e. "sky."

Indeed, words can have more than one meaning in the Hebrew, and that Messianic Jews of 2000 years ago picked a Greek word to convey "heaven" as they did and yet it can mean more is not without precedent in their own language.

Without knowing all, we have a clue from Paul in a letter he wrote to the Corinthians where he plainly says: third heaven.

He uses this word loosely in conjunction with "paradise."

The process by which this man got there is described as being caught up.


Let's stop there for a moment. You missed my point above. The word "harpazoo" does NOT contain the word "up" and yet it was translated that way. Translations are NOT inspired of God. Only the original texts were inspired by God. Thus, as the works of men, they are not flawless and occasionally, in their zeal to convey some of the truth they are trying to put into English, they will inevitably make some minor error. In most cases, these flaws are innoculous and harmless ... UNLESS someone is trying to be fastidious and very attentive to the details! To reiterate: The word for "UP" is NOT in 2 Cor. 12:1-4!!! Furthermore, the word "harpazoo" has been used for other "snatches!"

My premise is that the man Paul knew (whether this person was Paul or not IMO is irrelevant) was NOT "caught UP" but was "snatched" away to the FUTURE! (which is typical for those who are given prophetic visions in the Scriptures.)

The fact that he calls it "Paradise" (transliterated from the Greek word "paradeisos") is NOT insignificant! There are only three occurrences of the word in the NT: Luke 23:43, 2 Cor. 12:4, and Rev. 2:7:

Luke 23:39-43
39 And one of the malefactors which were hanged railed on him, saying, If thou be Christ, save thyself and us.
40 But the other answering rebuked him, saying, Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation?
41 And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds: but this man hath done nothing amiss.
42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom.
43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.
KJV

2 Cor 12:1-4
12:1 It is not expedient for me doubtless to glory. I will come to visions and revelations of the Lord.
2 I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the third heaven.
3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;)
4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.
KJV

Rev 2:7
7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
KJV

First, let me say that the reference in Luke 23 is a DEPENDENT fact, i.e., how one defines "paradise" will DETERMINE the interpretation of Luke 23. And, there IS more than one interpretation possible!

On the other hand, the last passage from Revelation contains additional information and their clues. In Rev. 2:7 this "paradise" is undeniably linked to the "tree of life." Furthermore, there are a mere handful of verses that talk about the tree of life, too. They are Rev. 2:7, Rev. 22:2, and Rev. 22:14:

Rev 2:7
7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
KJV

Rev 22:1-2
22:1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
2 In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
KJV

Rev 22:14
14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
KJV

Now, while Revelation 2:7 says that the "tree of life" is in the middle of the "paradise of God," Revelation 22:2 says that the "tree of life" is in the median of the street of gold that is found within the New Jerusalem that descends to the earth after the 1000-year incarceration of haSatan and after the Global Fire and after the creation of the New Earth! Thus, if A = B and B = C, then A = C, and we can then determine that "the paradise of God" IS "the New Jerusalem" as John saw it on the New Earth in Rev. 21 and 22.

Furthermore, the Greek word "paradeisos" comes from the Hebrew word "pardeis" meaning "park" or "orchard."

THEN, you said,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint
The whole description is in context of receiving visions and revelations from God, and this person, not Paul - because he is not boasting of himself - heard things which at the time Paul had met him fourteen years ago, was not able to tell.

All I have done is to come up with a logical layering of the realm of the spiritual beyond this mortal world to ask: from where are the dead resurrected? To which, along with the revelation supplied by Jesus through John that there is a realm in the spiritual world reserved only for martyred Saints - not only allows me to answer from where the "dead in Christ" are raised from but also answers why Paul would say there are three "heavens" in another manner of speaking.

So to conclude, you can keep your definition. It works just fine aside from where the souls who have departed this world reside until such time as they are resurrected from the grave.

And your definitions do not refute mine. As a separate concept, they can co-exist just fine.

I am not going to change your mind, and you have not changed mine.

I suggest we drop this as it has been entirely played out and let the thread get back to its original theme: Is the Rapture Scriptural?


Let's not be too hasty! Quite simply, the Rapture IS scriptural. The concept of being "snatched away" (Greek: harpazoo, Latin: raptus) IS found in the Bible, particularly in I Thes. 4:13-17. HOWEVER, in order to understand the Rapture and place it correctly in the chronology of future events as foretold in prophecy, one must know its PURPOSE, and TO THAT END is where I am going with this line of reasoning; so, please don't think that all of this is off-track! I am meticulous if I am anything, and the PURPOSE for the "rapture" is THE KEY to this discussion!

And, I don't see our definitions as being able to co-exist because we have thus come to a very different understanding of "heaven" that is paramount to this purpose for the "rapture." "WHERE are we going when we are 'raptured'?" is important! Equally important is the question, "WHY are we going when we are 'raptured'?"

You see, my definitions and the logic that I have spelled out in the last several posts lead me to a "third heaven" that is CHRONOLOGICALLY "third" while most Christians believe in some ethereal place beyond the stars that is SPATIALLY "third!" Your scenario is just a slightly different take on the SPATIALLY "third heaven!" I don't believe in this ethereal place called "Heaven" AT ALL! I believe (and I think it is supported fully by Scriptures) that all the descriptions that Christians apply to their understanding of "Heaven" are actually descriptions about the NEW JERUSALEM, a physical, literal city that will descend to the New Earth over a thousand years from now!

You asked the question, "From where are the dead resurrected?" The answer, according to numerous Scriptures, is FROM THE GRAVE! They (we) will be LITERALLY given our bodies back, albeit ENHANCED bodies as different from our original bodies as wheat stalks with heads of wheat are from the wheat seeds that went into the ground in the first place!

To understand that last paragraph, you will have to investigate a few more definitions, namely the definitions of "soul" and "spirit." In any case, that's enough for now.

Retrobyter




Lapidoth -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/13/2008 2:19:28 PM)

I like the "new body" thought.
One of my future "hopes." LOL.




Sinner-Saint -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/13/2008 3:26:52 PM)

Suffice to say that I still disagree with you after all your badgering on this subject where you are trying to correct me in little ways which even include "up" when we know the Rapture is going to be up into the clouds...

However, on this one thing, you demonstrate your simplicity as to where the dead in Christ come from and how:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter
You asked the question, "From where are the dead resurrected?" The answer, according to numerous Scriptures, is FROM THE GRAVE! They (we) will be LITERALLY given our bodies back, albeit ENHANCED bodies as different from our original bodies as wheat stalks with heads of wheat are from the wheat seeds that went into the ground in the first place!

First of all, Jesus, as our Lord, who has the keys to death and Hades gives us the only glimpse of the afterlife in Luke 16:19-31 and it is not in a pine box six feet under.

Furthermore, Jesus tells the thief on His right where they will be when they die and that is paradise, so I think the word is important. Their souls do not inhabit separate graves...

Paul also refutes what you say in speaking to the Corinthians where he gives a lot of detail about the resurrection of the dead. From 1Co 15:35 and onwards, Paul says that it is foolish to think that what is sown is what is raised.

So we are not LITERALLY given our bodies back! It is NOT an natural body, but a spiritual one. Indeed, in many cases from centuries past, you'd have God re-create a natural body so He can change it. I don't think it will work like that at all from Paul's explanation.

This does not mean that we won't be able to distinguish ourselves from one another nor that we won't be able to recognize others because the rich man was certainly able to recognize Lazarus the beggar.

Your ideas are not in accordance with Paul's teaching, and are too simple. You do not even ask from where the dead are raised, nor do you have to have a spiritual place where they rest until they are selectively called up.

I stand by my concept whereby there are three levels of heaven:

1. The place where the dead rest/endure (spiritually living vs. spiritually dead)
2. The place where the martyred Saints wait.
3. The presence of God where Jesus is now.




Retrobyter -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/15/2008 8:55:20 PM)

Shalom, Sinner-Saint.

Okay, as I said, you also need to know the definitions of “spirit” and “soul".

The words for “spirit,” “ruach” in Hebrew and “pneuma” in Greek, both literally mean the “wind” or a “forceful breath!”

The words for “soul,” “nefesh” in Hebrew and “psuchee” in Greek, both refer to the animated person, and the word “nefesh” further refers to the one who “breathes!”

And for good measure, let’s also include the words for “body,” “geviyah” in Hebrew and “sooma” in Greek.

Thus, literally speaking, the “nefesh” is the combination of the “geviyah” with its “ruach” in Hebrew, and the “psuchee” is the combination of the “sooma” with its “pneuma” in Greek. The one who “breathes” is the combination of the “body” with its “forceful breath!” So, in translation to our English words, the “soul” is the combination of the “body” and its “spirit.”

Now, by analogy, if we want to say that the “ruach” or the “pneuma” is the “immaterial part of a person,” then we should conclude that the “nefesh” or the “psuchee” is a combination of the “body” with that “immaterial part of a person.”

That being said, we must be careful which word is which! IF we are going to talk about a person who is in the state of death, i.e. after the event of dying and before the event of the resurrection, we must be sure that we are seeing the word “spirit” (Hebrew: “ruach”; Greek “pneuma”)! IF we see the word “soul” (Hebrew: “nefesh”; Greek: “psuchee”), then we are talking about the person BEFORE the event of dying or AFTER the event of resurrection!

Now, let’s look at what you said,…

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint
“First of all, Jesus, as our Lord, who has the keys to death and Hades gives us the only glimpse of the afterlife in Luke 16:19-31 and it is not in a pine box six feet under.”


You’re right. The Greek word in Luke 16:19-31 IS “hadees” which means the “unseen.” HOWEVER, that word HAS been applied to “the grave!” There are two ways of looking at this passage: One way (which you and others have chosen to accept, often unwittingly through the teachings of others) is to say that the whole event is taking place in “hadees.” The other way of looking at this passage is that the rich man is INITIALLY in “hadees” when resurrected and it is while he is still “in hadees” that he experiences pain from the flames! It would be hard to “lift up one’s eyes” or “be touched by a finger on one’s tongue” without the “body!” Thus, I see this as a description of what will happen immediately AFTER the resurrection of the unjust, and not between the unjust rich man’s event of dying and his resurrection to condemnation.

Then you said,…

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint
“Furthermore, Jesus tells the thief on His right where they will be when they die and that is paradise, so I think the word is important. Their souls do not inhabit separate graves...”


Ah, but if he is immediately as a spirit in the New Jerusalem or is immediately (from his point of view) again in his body being resurrected to the final state, then he CAN be in “paradeisos” as was investigated earlier! Some have also suggested that the New Jerusalem will be in orbit above the second earth, above the old Jerusalem, during the 1000-year incarceration of haSatan before the earth is renovated!

Then, you said,…

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinner-Saint
“Paul also refutes what you say in speaking to the Corinthians where he gives a lot of detail about the resurrection of the dead. From 1Co 15:35 and onwards, Paul says that it is foolish to think that what is sown is what is raised.

“So we are not LITERALLY given our bodies back! It is NOT a natural body, but a spiritual one. Indeed, in many cases from centuries past, you'd have God re-create a natural body so He can change it. I don't think it will work like that at all from Paul's explanation.

“This does not mean that we won't be able to distinguish ourselves from one another nor that we won't be able to recognize others because the rich man was certainly able to recognize Lazarus the beggar.

“Your ideas are not in accordance with Paul's teaching, and are too simple. You do not even ask from where the dead are raised, nor do you have to have a spiritual place where they rest until they are selectively called up.

“I stand by my concept whereby there are three levels of heaven:

1. The place where the dead rest/endure (spiritually living vs. spiritually dead)
2. The place where the martyred Saints wait.
3. The presence of God where Jesus is now.”


Now, wait just one minute! I DO NOT believe that Paul would “refute” what others have said in Scriptures!

Job 19:23-27
23 Oh that my words were now written! oh that they were printed in a book!
24 That they were graven with an iron pen and lead in the rock for ever!
25 For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:
26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:
27 Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.
KJV


I believe in the inspiration of the WHOLE of God’s Word, the Bible! Therefore, Iyov’s (Job’s) words are JUST as true as are Paul’s, and since BOTH were inspired to write by the same God who never changes, they will not contradict each other! “YET IN MY FLESH shall I see God!” THAT’S the Resurrection!

Now, since YOU used the word (“spiritual”), you’ve opened up the next couple of definitions:
“Spiritual” is the word that was used to translate “pneumatikos,” which is the adjective form of “pneuma.” (However, be aware that there is also one occurrence where “pneuma” itself was translated as “spiritual.”)
“Natural” is one word that was used to translate “psuchikos,” which is the adjective form of “psuchee.” (The other word is “sensual,” although for I Cor. 15, “natural” is the word.)
Paul used these two words as contrasts regarding the Resurrection. Our bodies are “planted” as “natural” bodies, but they will be resurrected as “spiritual” bodies.
So, let’s let Paul tell us the difference. Now, let’s be fair! It’s not allowed to use our preconceived definitions of “spiritual” and “natural” to determine what Paul “meant” in I Corinthians 15 BY using the terms! That would be circular reasoning. So, here goes:

1 Cor. 15:35-58
35 But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come?
36 Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:
37 And that which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall be, but bare grain, it may chance of wheat, or of some other grain:
38 But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed his own body.
39 All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.
40 There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory.
42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:
44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.
48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.
49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.
55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?
56 The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.
57 But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
58 Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord.
KJV


So, let’s list them:

BEFORE the event of dying:
1. Natural (Greek: psuchikos) – “breather-of-air-like”
2. Terrestrial (Greek: epigeia) – “above/upon-earth-like”
3. The first man Adam (Greek: ho prootos anthroopos Adam) – “the original human Adam”
4. Living soul (Greek: eis psucheen zoosan) – “into [a] living breather-of-air”
5. The first man … of the earth (Greek: ho prootos anthroopos ek geis) – “the original human out [of] earth”
6. Earthy (Greek: choikos) – “soil-like”
7. Flesh and blood (Greek: sarx kai haima) – “muscle and blood”
8. Corruption (Greek: fthora, ftharton) – “decay”
9. Mortal (Greek: thneeton) – “liable to die”

AFTER the event of resurrection:
1. Spiritual (Greek: pneumatikos) – “blaster-of-air-like”
2. Celestial (Greek: epourania) – “above/upon-sky-like”
3. The last Adam [Yeshua`] (Greek: ho eschatos Adam) – “the final Adam”
4. Quickening spirit (Greek: eis pneuma zoo-opoioun ) – “into [a] life-giving blaster-of-air”
5. The second man (the Lord) from heaven (Greek: ho dueteros anthroopos ex ouranou) – “the second human out [of] sky” [Most of the oldest Greek texts don’t have the words “ho kurios” and there’s a great degree of certainty that it wasn’t there originally, although it certainly fits the Second Human, Yeshua` haMashiach.]
6. Heavenly (Greek: epouranios) – “of or from above-sky”
7. The Kingdom of God (Greek: basileian Theou) – “kingdom [of] God”; “God’s kingdom”
8. Incorruption (Greek: aftharsian) – “no decay”; “undecaying”
9. Immortality (Greek: athanasian) – “no dying”; “deathlessness”

BOTH sets are physical, but the second set is definitely the stronger! No decay! No dying! Not just able to live, but being able to give life! Not just able to breathe air, but being able to blast with air like the wind!

So,…

YES! I believe emphatically that we are LITERALLY given our bodies back! You are right that the body BECOMES a spiritual one rather than just a natural one. Furthermore, God will re-create the natural body as the supernatural body with the changes already in place; “the dead shall be raised incorruptible.” Then, the living children of God will just have their natural bodies changed; “we shall be changed.” He will NOT have to “re-create a natural body so He can change it.” Looking at the text, I think that’s EXACTLY how it will work from Paul's explanation!

Ponder on!

Retrobyter




LoyalGypsy -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/15/2008 10:24:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

Shalom, Sinner-Saint.

Okay, as I said, you also need to know the definitions of “spirit” and “soul".

The words for “spirit,” “ruach” in Hebrew and “pneuma” in Greek, both literally mean the “wind” or a “forceful breath!”

The words for “soul,” “nefesh” in Hebrew and “psuchee” in Greek, both refer to the animated person, and the word “nefesh” further refers to the one who “breathes!”

And for good measure, let’s also include the words for “body,” “geviyah” in Hebrew and “sooma” in Greek.

Thus, literally speaking, the “nefesh” is the combination of the “geviyah” with its “ruach” in Hebrew, and the “psuchee” is the combination of the “sooma” with its “pneuma” in Greek. The one who “breathes” is the combination of the “body” with its “forceful breath!” So, in translation to our English words, the “soul” is the combination of the “body” and its “spirit.”

Now, by analogy, if we want to say that the “ruach” or the “pneuma” is the “immaterial part of a person,” then we should conclude that the “nefesh” or the “psuchee” is a combination of the “body” with that “immaterial part of a person.”

That being said, we must be careful which word is which! IF we are going to talk about a person who is in the state of death, i.e. after the event of dying and before the event of the resurrection, we must be sure that we are seeing the word “spirit” (Hebrew: “ruach”; Greek “pneuma”)! IF we see the word “soul” (Hebrew: “nefesh”; Greek: “psuchee”), then we are talking about the person BEFORE the event of dying or AFTER the event of resurrection!




Greetings




quote:

You’re right. The Greek word in Luke 16:19-31 IS “hadees” which means the “unseen.” HOWEVER, that word HAS been applied to “the grave!”

There are two ways of looking at this passage: One way (which you and others have chosen to accept, often unwittingly through the teachings of others) is to say that the whole event is taking place in “hadees.”

The other way of looking at this passage is that the rich man is INITIALLY in “hadees” when resurrected and it is while he is still “in hadees” that he experiences pain from the flames!

It would be hard to “lift up one’s eyes” or “be touched by a finger on one’s tongue” without the “body!” Thus, I see this as a description of what will happen immediately AFTER the resurrection of the unjust, and not between the unjust rich man’s event of dying and his resurrection to condemnation.


quote:

IF we see the word “soul” (Hebrew: “nefesh”; Greek: “psuchee”), then we are talking about the person BEFORE the event of dying or AFTER the event of resurrection!

Arent they one in the same??


The context of Luke 16:19-31 is speaking of paradise, in the parable Christ has not yet risen…
36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
SO we have both the righteous dead and the condemned in Luke 16:19-31

The term being touched by Lazarus .......that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and “cool my tongue”… is about words or evil words which the rich man brought forth from the good things he received and .....are that which Lazarus received….they have been given account thereof

16:25
But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
Mt 12:35 - Show Context
35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.


36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

Verse 16 does not say the rich man ….brought forth good things…. but that he receivedst good things…which were Moses and the Prophets…

and .....an evil man out of the evil treasure “bringeth forth” evil things…. which Lazarus receivedst from the rich man or Moses and the Prophets

The rich man in this context is a type of Parasitical Israel; who believed in the resurrection, but did not believe that one whom would be raised from the dead.... would be among the living.[;)]

Therefore the crux of the passages is in verse .....31 And he said unto him, If they ...hear (get a revelation) ….. If they ...hear not….. Moses and the prophets,
neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.



Loyal Gypsy




Retrobyter -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/15/2008 11:21:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy

Greetings

.....
quote:

IF we see the word “soul” (Hebrew: “nefesh”; Greek: “psuchee”), then we are talking about the person BEFORE the event of dying or AFTER the event of resurrection!

Arent they one in the same??


Frankly, no. The event of dying, which every person goes through at the apparent "end" of their lives, is different for each person. The event of resurrection is a GROUP event, a universal event! All of the righteous (just or justified by God) will be raised to life at the same time and will be FIRST! Then, a thousand years later, all of the unrighteous will be raised to condemnation and eternal suffering. It is at this time (IMO) that passages like Luke 16 occur.

Then you said, ...
quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy
The context of Luke 16:19-31 is speaking of paradise, in the parable Christ has not yet risen…
36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
SO we have both the righteous dead and the condemned in Luke 16:19-31


Well, I'll tell ya, I believe that Yeshua` was speaking about the FUTURE, that His recounting of this occurrence is PROPHETIC! Therefore, it wouldn't matter that "the Messiah (Christ) has not yet risen."

Then, things get dangerously hairy:

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy
The term being touched by Lazarus .......that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and “cool my tongue”… is about words or evil words which the rich man brought forth from the good things he received and .....are that which Lazarus received….they have been given account thereof

16:25
But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
Mt 12:35 - Show Context
35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.


36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

Verse 16 does not say the rich man ….brought forth good things…. but that he receivedst good things…which were Moses and the Prophets…

and .....an evil man out of the evil treasure “bringeth forth” evil things…. which Lazarus receivedst from the rich man or Moses and the Prophets

The rich man in this context is a type of Parasitical Israel; who believed in the resurrection, but did not believe that one whom would be raised from the dead.... would be among the living.[;)]

Therefore the crux of the passages is in verse .....31 And he said unto him, If they ...hear (get a revelation) ….. If they ...hear not….. Moses and the prophets,
neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.

Loyal Gypsy


Now, you're just getting too allegorical for your own good. Don't mix passages of the Bible without good reason! There's NO good reason for mixing Matthew 12:35-37 with Luke 16! To allegorize the physical descriptions of Luke 16 to mere words and their consequences in Matthew 12, is a little like saying that "since 16/16 = 1 and 25/25 = 1 and since 1 = 1, then 16=25!" It's just not right! You need to be a little more careful to be sure that you're comparing apples to oranges!

Retrobyter




eschatologist -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/16/2008 8:42:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ezra

quote:

ORIGINAL: ccoppenbarger
That doesn't work, Ezra, because the Tribulation is not the Wrath of God


Just because you or some others choose to redefine things in Scripture does not make them so. So unless you can prove from Scripture that the Tribulation (including the Great Tribulation) is not a manifestation of God's wrath, you do not have a case.


The difference is in the definition. The word tribulation basically means trouble. And the kind of trouble it's talking about is persecution. The word tribulation is used quite a few times in this context. The following verses are one example:

"Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you; and to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord shall be revealed from Heaven with His mighty Angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ." (2Thessalonians 1:6-8)

So when we're talking about the Great tribulation, we're talking about the Antichrist's persecution of the true believers, the church of God. When we're talking about the wrath of God, we're talking about God's Punishment or judgments on the wicked unbelievers. We are not appointed to wrath because we have obeyed God's commandments by recieving and believing in His Son, Jesus. Therefore we are not going to be punished by God. But we will be persecuted, hounded and troubled by the unbelievers. Jesus Himself promised it: "If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you." This is what the great tribulation is; the greatest persecution of the church in all of History, after which Jesus comes back to rescue and save His children from the evil clutches of the antichrist by rapturing and resurrecting us at His second coming. Then follows the wrath of God on the wicked who are left behind in this world. So the Great tribulation and the wrath of God are 2 separate events.




LoyalGypsy -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/16/2008 10:43:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy

Greetings

.....
quote:

IF we see the word “soul” (Hebrew: “nefesh”; Greek: “psuchee”), then we are talking about the person BEFORE the event of dying or AFTER the event of resurrection!

Arent they one in the same??


Frankly, no. The event of dying, which every person goes through at the apparent "end" of their lives, is different for each person. The event of resurrection is a GROUP event, a universal event! All of the righteous (just or justified by God) will be raised to life at the same time and will be FIRST! Then, a thousand years later, all of the unrighteous will be raised to condemnation and eternal suffering. It is at this time (IMO) that passages like Luke 16 occur.

Then you said, ...
quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy
The context of Luke 16:19-31 is speaking of paradise, in the parable Christ has not yet risen…
36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
SO we have both the righteous dead and the condemned in Luke 16:19-31


Well, I'll tell ya, I believe that Yeshua` was speaking about the FUTURE, that His recounting of this occurrence is PROPHETIC! Therefore, it wouldn't matter that "the Messiah (Christ) has not yet risen."

Then, things get dangerously hairy:

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy
The term being touched by Lazarus .......that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and “cool my tongue”… is about words or evil words which the rich man brought forth from the good things he received and .....are that which Lazarus received….they have been given account thereof

16:25
But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
Mt 12:35 - Show Context
35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.


36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

Verse 16 does not say the rich man ….brought forth good things…. but that he receivedst good things…which were Moses and the Prophets…

and .....an evil man out of the evil treasure “bringeth forth” evil things…. which Lazarus receivedst from the rich man or Moses and the Prophets

The rich man in this context is a type of Parasitical Israel; who believed in the resurrection, but did not believe that one whom would be raised from the dead.... would be among the living.[;)]

Therefore the crux of the passages is in verse .....31 And he said unto him, If they ...hear (get a revelation) ….. If they ...hear not….. Moses and the prophets,
neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.

Loyal Gypsy


Retrobyter


Greetings,

quote:

Now, you're just getting too allegorical for your own good. Don't mix passages of the Bible without good reason! There's NO good reason for mixing Matthew 12:35-37 with Luke 16! To allegorize the physical descriptions of Luke 16 to mere words and their consequences in Matthew 12, is a little like saying that "since 16/16 = 1 and 25/25 = 1 and since 1 = 1, then 16=25!" It's just not right! You need to be a little more careful to be sure that you're comparing apples to oranges!

Retrobyter


Ok ...thanks Ret.

But I am not finished yet...LOL!

quote:

Now, you're just getting too allegorical for your own good. Don't mix passages of the Bible without good reason!
You need to be a little more careful to be sure that you're comparing apples to oranges!


Trust me we've only begun...LOL!

I don’t know what the fruit is going to taste like in Heaven but while on earth I took comfort and traced down the meaning of those words above, but it seems pretty literal IMHO.

And I would not be that knowledgeable to find the correct word in the Greek as to how fast that snatching or catching away is going to occur, but The Latin word for this being presented below is…. well actually in part!….. Is called the Rapture, or the 1st resurrection mentioned by St John in the book of Revelation,


quote:

Frankly, no. The event of dying, which every person goes through at the apparent "end" of their lives, is different for each person. The event of resurrection is a GROUP event, a universal event!

Hold those thoughts….. I am going to head back to what you mentioned here
quote:

Luke 23 is a DEPENDENT fact, i.e., how one defines "paradise" will DETERMINE the interpretation of Luke 23. And, there IS more than one interpretation possible!
KJV




I am basically following a simple pattern concerning words..... Which was later reiterated by Moses in the teaching of the children of Israel by the way in which he commanded them.... = word structures= and those words as spoken on the Calvary crosses in Luke 23

For example …word structures......
from the first time Adam lied to God when God asked if he had eaten from the tree, that consequence of sin is based on Adams words in the response to God; and is what brought forth both the fall and the promise of a Messiah,
And in like manner that same lie God will allow mankind to believe in 2 thess 2 without the promise of a Messiah, by which God will condemn.......
word structures always provide 2 parts by the way in which He commands them





You did say….
quote:

how one defines "paradise" will DETERMINE the interpretation of Luke 23. …….And,
………. there IS more than one interpretation possible!


Let’s see what that other interpretation is; to see if there is a promise of rapture in the simple words or word pattern spoken at the Calvary
So let’s try to define what is or what is not is paradise....or where it has moved to in the Heavens in reference to
Luke 23:42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom.
43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.
And Matthew 27:50-52
And the pattern in verse 50-52 of Matthew 27 that will be repeated exactly the same at the rapture of the Church in 1Th 4:16-17





But to start we need a couple of questions to be answered…because I see a couple of misnomers here that need addressing concerning the event of resurrection being a GROUP event, and a universal event.

....Can you tell us why Jesus promised this to the thief simply by looking at what was spoken in verse 43 of Luke 23; To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.
While at the same time there were additions that followed when Jesus yielded up His spirit seen in Matt 27:50-52....where Paradise was emptied
.....As it reads in v52 …and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised

Now……In reference to a group event….We don’t see a group event here, mainly because the thief was still living when Jesus yielded up His spirit in Matt 27, therefore the thiefs body was not included in that promise of rememberence in Luke 23

quote:

Frankly, no. The event of dying, which every person goes through at the apparent "end" of their lives, is different for each person. The event of resurrection is a GROUP event, a universal event!


Then how could Jesus make that promise to the thief unless paridise was moved??




LG




whisperingwaters -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/17/2008 5:41:15 AM)

Sinner-Saint I found your view to be very much informative and interesting it made me think about the three heavens as I never have thought before, thanks for sharing.




Lapidoth -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/17/2008 12:07:20 PM)

Thought you might be interested in Todd Bentley's rendition of the 3 heavens. lol.
Since he "claims" to be an eye-witness.

quote:

“Next, I was at Paul’s house and he said to eat the Book of Titus! What’s more, several days later I was taken back into heaven to Paul’s house! But this time I didn’t go inside. I stayed outside where I saw a ladder in his back yard like the one described in Genesis 28, Jacob’s ladder. [I've come to understand that there are ladders like that in heaven in order to ascend and descend into different realms because heaven has places, geographical places. For example, the first heaven is where we live on the earth; the second heaven is the invisible realm of Ephesians 6:12; and the third heaven where I was with Paul, it's the Paradise of God.] So I jumped onto the ladder and began to climb up into another realm. I saw around me that it was all clouds so I began to pull those clouds back. As I did, a hole opened up in the heavens. Immediately then, out of heaven, flowed the color green, not just a light; it was like a green liquid and it was pouring onto my eyes! When I asked God about this, He said, ‘You are coming into the throne room; you are beneath the sea of glass; there is a rainbow around the throne. It’s not just above the throne; it’s a circle around the throne, a rainbow, emerald, green in color.’”


I thought I would also add, this is NOT the 3 heavens in Scripture.
Sounds good, but rubbage just the same.




Retrobyter -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/17/2008 11:37:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eschatologist

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ezra

quote:

ORIGINAL: ccoppenbarger
That doesn't work, Ezra, because the Tribulation is not the Wrath of God


Just because you or some others choose to redefine things in Scripture does not make them so. So unless you can prove from Scripture that the Tribulation (including the Great Tribulation) is not a manifestation of God's wrath, you do not have a case.


The difference is in the definition. The word tribulation basically means trouble. And the kind of trouble it's talking about is persecution. The word tribulation is used quite a few times in this context. The following verses are one example:

"Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you; and to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord shall be revealed from Heaven with His mighty Angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ." (2Thessalonians 1:6-8)

So when we're talking about the Great tribulation, we're talking about the Antichrist's persecution of the true believers, the church of God. When we're talking about the wrath of God, we're talking about God's Punishment or judgments on the wicked unbelievers. We are not appointed to wrath because we have obeyed God's commandments by recieving and believing in His Son, Jesus. Therefore we are not going to be punished by God. But we will be persecuted, hounded and troubled by the unbelievers. Jesus Himself promised it: "If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you." This is what the great tribulation is; the greatest persecution of the church in all of History, after which Jesus comes back to rescue and save His children from the evil clutches of the antichrist by rapturing and resurrecting us at His second coming. Then follows the wrath of God on the wicked who are left behind in this world. So the Great tribulation and the wrath of God are 2 separate events.


Shalom, eschatologist!

Just a little help and a correction, if you don't mind.

First, when you said, "The word tribulation basically means 'trouble.' And the kind of trouble it's talking about is persecution," you were right!!! The Greek word "thlipsis" translated as "tribulation" more accurately means "hounding" or "harassing." Literally, it means "pressure," and it IS talking about "persecution!"

ON THE OTHER HAND, HOWEVER, it most definitely is NOT "the Antichrist's persecution of the true believers, the church of God"! To the contrary, Yeshua` was talking about the pressure put upon the remnant of the House of Isra'el that will be facing persecution and attempted genocide from her neighbors, those countries who surround her and have vowed to "drive her into the sea!"

The Scriptures have been and always will be about the CHILDREN OF ISRA'EL! We Goyim (Gentiles or non-Jews) who are believers have fortunately been included in that Commonwealth of Isra'el through being grafted into the Olive Tree, just as modern Jews are also grafted back into their own Olive Tree, David's Kingdom, when they accept Yeshua` (Jesus) as their Messiah (Christ), or rather, as the Messiah of God offered to them as their King.

Retrobyter




Retrobyter -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/18/2008 12:23:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy

Greetings

.....
quote:

IF we see the word “soul” (Hebrew: “nefesh”; Greek: “psuchee”), then we are talking about the person BEFORE the event of dying or AFTER the event of resurrection!

Arent they one in the same??


Frankly, no. The event of dying, which every person goes through at the apparent "end" of their lives, is different for each person. The event of resurrection is a GROUP event, a universal event! All of the righteous (just or justified by God) will be raised to life at the same time and will be FIRST! Then, a thousand years later, all of the unrighteous will be raised to condemnation and eternal suffering. It is at this time (IMO) that passages like Luke 16 occur.

Then you said, ...
quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy
The context of Luke 16:19-31 is speaking of paradise, in the parable Christ has not yet risen…
36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
SO we have both the righteous dead and the condemned in Luke 16:19-31


Well, I'll tell ya, I believe that Yeshua` was speaking about the FUTURE, that His recounting of this occurrence is PROPHETIC! Therefore, it wouldn't matter that "the Messiah (Christ) has not yet risen."

Then, things get dangerously hairy:

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoyalGypsy
The term being touched by Lazarus .......that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and “cool my tongue”… is about words or evil words which the rich man brought forth from the good things he received and .....are that which Lazarus received….they have been given account thereof

16:25
But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
Mt 12:35 - Show Context
35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.


36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

Verse 16 does not say the rich man ….brought forth good things…. but that he receivedst good things…which were Moses and the Prophets…

and .....an evil man out of the evil treasure “bringeth forth” evil things…. which Lazarus receivedst from the rich man or Moses and the Prophets

The rich man in this context is a type of Parasitical Israel; who believed in the resurrection, but did not believe that one whom would be raised from the dead.... would be among the living.[;)]

Therefore the crux of the passages is in verse .....31 And he said unto him, If they ...hear (get a revelation) ….. If they ...hear not….. Moses and the prophets,
neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.

Loyal Gypsy


Retrobyter


Greetings,

quote:

Now, you're just getting too allegorical for your own good. Don't mix passages of the Bible without good reason! There's NO good reason for mixing Matthew 12:35-37 with Luke 16! To allegorize the physical descriptions of Luke 16 to mere words and their consequences in Matthew 12, is a little like saying that "since 16/16 = 1 and 25/25 = 1 and since 1 = 1, then 16=25!" It's just not right! You need to be a little more careful to be sure that you're comparing apples to oranges!

Retrobyter


Ok ...thanks Ret.

But I am not finished yet...LOL!

quote:

Now, you're just getting too allegorical for your own good. Don't mix passages of the Bible without good reason!
You need to be a little more careful to be sure that you're comparing apples to oranges!


Trust me we've only begun...LOL!

I don’t know what the fruit is going to taste like in Heaven but while on earth I took comfort and traced down the meaning of those words above, but it seems pretty literal IMHO.

And I would not be that knowledgeable to find the correct word in the Greek as to how fast that snatching or catching away is going to occur, but The Latin word for this being presented below is…. well actually in part!….. Is called the Rapture, or the 1st resurrection mentioned by St John in the book of Revelation,


quote:

Frankly, no. The event of dying, which every person goes through at the apparent "end" of their lives, is different for each person. The event of resurrection is a GROUP event, a universal event!

Hold those thoughts….. I am going to head back to what you mentioned here
quote:

Luke 23 is a DEPENDENT fact, i.e., how one defines "paradise" will DETERMINE the interpretation of Luke 23. And, there IS more than one interpretation possible!
KJV




I am basically following a simple pattern concerning words..... Which was later reiterated by Moses in the teaching of the children of Israel by the way in which he commanded them.... = word structures= and those words as spoken on the Calvary crosses in Luke 23

For example …word structures......
from the first time Adam lied to God when God asked if he had eaten from the tree, that consequence of sin is based on Adams words in the response to God; and is what brought forth both the fall and the promise of a Messiah,
And in like manner that same lie God will allow mankind to believe in 2 thess 2 without the promise of a Messiah, by which God will condemn.......
word structures always provide 2 parts by the way in which He commands them





You did say….
quote:

how one defines "paradise" will DETERMINE the interpretation of Luke 23. …….And,
………. there IS more than one interpretation possible!


Let’s see what that other interpretation is; to see if there is a promise of rapture in the simple words or word pattern spoken at the Calvary
So let’s try to define what is or what is not is paradise....or where it has moved to in the Heavens in reference to
Luke 23:42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom.
43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.
And Matthew 27:50-52
And the pattern in verse 50-52 of Matthew 27 that will be repeated exactly the same at the rapture of the Church in 1Th 4:16-17





But to start we need a couple of questions to be answered…because I see a couple of misnomers here that need addressing concerning the event of resurrection being a GROUP event, and a universal event.

....Can you tell us why Jesus promised this to the thief simply by looking at what was spoken in verse 43 of Luke 23; To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.
While at the same time there were additions that followed when Jesus yielded up His spirit seen in Matt 27:50-52....where Paradise was emptied
.....As it reads in v52 …and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised

Now……In reference to a group event….We don’t see a group event here, mainly because the thief was still living when Jesus yielded up His spirit in Matt 27, therefore the thiefs body was not included in that promise of rememberence in Luke 23

quote:

Frankly, no. The event of dying, which every person goes through at the apparent "end" of their lives, is different for each person. The event of resurrection is a GROUP event, a universal event!


Then how could Jesus make that promise to the thief unless paridise was moved??




LG


Shalom, LoyalGypsy!

Well, I've looked at the two passages and here's what they say:

Matt 27:50-53
50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.
KJV


1 Thess 4:16-17
16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
KJV


While there is a little similarity, namely, "the dead...shall rise," the rest is NOT AT ALL the same! Frankly, even THIS similarity is not truly the same. You see, the "resurrections" that happened at Yeshua`s death was not the same kind of Resurrection that will happen, predicted in 1 Thes. 4! See, there's another passage to consider: the great Resurrection Chapter, 1 Cor. 15. There, we are told that the body before the Resurrection is a mere "psucheen zoosan" body, a "living air-breather" body, but in the Resurrection, our bodies will be like Yeshua`s body, a "pneuma zoo-opoioun" body, a "life-giving air-blaster" body!

The "resurrections" that happened at Yeshua`s death were of the same caliber as the "resurrection" of Elezar (Lazarus), the brother of Miryam (Mary) and Marta (Martha). His "resurrection" was merely a return to life as a "psucheen zoosan." He was NOT a "pneuma zoo-opoioun" because Yeshua` was to be the FIRST-FRUITS of that Great Resurrection! All the others had to die again.

Consider ...
1 Cor 15:20-28:
20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept.
21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.
24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith, all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
KJV


This is why I can confidently say that only Yeshua` (so far) is a "pneuma zoo-opoioun", a "life-giving air-blaster!"

Thus, both Elezar and the "many saints" would have to die again, and await the Great Resurrection, when they would THEN be given bodies like our Lord's body!

Phil 3:20-21
20 For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ:
21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.
KJV


Finally, as to your comment on Paradise moving, Paradise was NEVER said to exist "in the center of the earth" as some claim, "as a separate compartment of Hell." That belief comes ONLY from the common interpretation of Luke 16 (which I reject) and from Greek/Roman mythology! It's a convenient belief that allows one to explain how Yeshua` could "lead captivity captive," suggesting that He led all the saints in "Abraham's Bosom" to "Heaven" after His Resurrection. Attempting to explain this passage found in Eph. 4:8, they have neglected to recognize that this verse is a DIRECT QUOTE from Ps. 68:18 and the 2 Hebrew words there mean "to lead the captives into captivity!" This is a prophecy of how God was to lead the Jews into captivity once again after Yeshua`s Ascension because of their unbelief! It has NOTHING to do with "transporting people to Heaven!" Paradise IS said to be the New Jerusalem, however, as I have explained above.

Retrobyter




Retrobyter -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/18/2008 1:25:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lapidoth

Thought you might be interested in Todd Bentley's rendition of the 3 heavens. lol.
Since he "claims" to be an eye-witness.

quote:

“Next, I was at Paul’s house and he said to eat the Book of Titus! What’s more, several days later I was taken back into heaven to Paul’s house! But this time I didn’t go inside. I stayed outside where I saw a ladder in his back yard like the one described in Genesis 28, Jacob’s ladder. [I've come to understand that there are ladders like that in heaven in order to ascend and descend into different realms because heaven has places, geographical places. For example, the first heaven is where we live on the earth; the second heaven is the invisible realm of Ephesians 6:12; and the third heaven where I was with Paul, it's the Paradise of God.] So I jumped onto the ladder and began to climb up into another realm. I saw around me that it was all clouds so I began to pull those clouds back. As I did, a hole opened up in the heavens. Immediately then, out of heaven, flowed the color green, not just a light; it was like a green liquid and it was pouring onto my eyes! When I asked God about this, He said, ‘You are coming into the throne room; you are beneath the sea of glass; there is a rainbow around the throne. It’s not just above the throne; it’s a circle around the throne, a rainbow, emerald, green in color.’”


I thought I would also add, this is NOT the 3 heavens in Scripture.
Sounds good, but rubbage just the same.


Shalom, Lapidoth!

LOL! ROFL! Ha! Ha! Ha! That is SO ... OUT there!!! Was he serious???! I can't believe that anyone would want to try to get people to believe that "rubbage" (a combination of "rubbish" and "garbage"?), as you say! Whoa! What a joke! I suppose he has gullible people believing him, though, right? (The flea in the cat's hair again says, "WOW!")[sm=icon_smile_yikes.gif][sm=hammerhead.gif][sm=icon_smile_faint.gif]

I suppose that there's a sign underneath the crystal sea that says, "Watch for falling green!" [sm=eek.gif] It's UNBELIEVABLE the STUFF that people will fall for!

Retrobyter




Lapidoth -> RE: IF the rapture is scriptural, (6/18/2008 12:58:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Retrobyter

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lapidoth

Thought you might be interested in Todd Bentley's rendition of the 3 heavens. lol.
Since he "claims" to be an eye-witness.

quote:

“Next, I was at Paul’s house and he said to eat the Book of Titus! What’s more, several days later I was taken back into heaven to Paul’s house! But this time I didn’t go inside. I stayed outside where I saw a ladder in his back yard like the one described in Genesis 28, Jacob’s ladder. [I've come to understand that there are ladders like that in heaven in order to ascend and descend into different realms because heaven has places, geographical places. For example, the first heaven is where we live on the earth; the second heaven is the invisible realm of Ephesians 6:12; and the third heaven where I was with Paul, it's the Paradise of God.] So I jumped onto the ladder and began to climb up into another realm. I saw around me that it was all clouds so I began to pull those clouds back. As I did, a hole opened up in the heavens. Immediately then, out of heaven, flowed the color green, not just a light; it was like a green liquid and it was pouring onto my eyes! When I asked God about this, He said, ‘You are coming into the throne room; you are beneath the sea of glass; there is a rainbow around the throne. It’s not just above the throne; it’s a circle around the throne, a rainbow, emerald, green in color.’”


I thought I would also add, this is NOT the 3 heavens in Scripture.
Sounds good, but rubbage just the same.


Shalom, Lapidoth!

LOL! ROFL! Ha! Ha! Ha! That is SO ... OUT there!!! Was he serious???! I can't believe that anyone would want to try to get people to believe that "rubbage" (a combination of "rubbish" and "garbage"?), as you say! Whoa! What a joke! I suppose he has gullible people believing him, though, right? (The flea in the cat's hair again says, "WOW!")[sm=icon_smile_yikes.gif][sm=hammerhead.gif][sm=icon_smile_faint.gif]

I suppose that there's a sign underneath the crystal sea that says, "Watch for falling green!" [sm=eek.gif] It's UNBELIEVABLE the STUFF that people will fall for!

Retrobyter



Thousands of gullible people are following him in Lakeland, Fla. (the latest great outpouring)
Pastors are loading up their congregations and hauling them down their to get their impartations
of 'false' annointings and then spreading it around the land.

http://forums.crosswalk.com/m_3378409/mpage_83/tm.htm




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 8 [9]



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI