Youthworker Journal Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Ministry Leaders Folder

Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
  Sponsor

RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Science & Origins >> RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/14/2008 6:53:24 PM   
unclemonkey


Posts: 1296
Joined: 5/14/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Nothingman
quote:

Evolution says nothing about God.

Schools teach that evolution is a function of nature completely unguided by anything other than natural laws which are also completely determined by the structure of the universe. I.e. if God does exist He is disconnected from the origin and operation of the universe.

I think that is saying something about God.

_____________________________

Visit my home church.
Also consider Life's Most Important Queston
Post #: 51
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/14/2008 7:03:47 PM   
unclemonkey


Posts: 1296
Joined: 5/14/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: 1dblthnk02
quote:

quote:

The claim of this thread is that “there are no non-religious arguments against evolution”. Jack and I have both disproved that claim.

Not yet you haven't. Nobody has yet on this thread. Argue this with Jack-- he helped bring this to light himself.

Maybe you haven’t actually read Jack’s posts. Here is a recent quote of his.
“I am pretty clear about the science that supports my viewpoint, which as far as ID is concerned isn't 'religious'.” – Jack, post #28, this thread

_____________________________

Visit my home church.
Also consider Life's Most Important Queston
Post #: 52
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 12:47:13 AM   
ianz

 

Posts: 388
Joined: 12/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: unclemonkey

quote:

On this basis, it seems that evolution theory is acceptable to many irrespective of their religious beliefs,

What does that have to do with the price of rice in China? Is the scientific validity of a concept determined by how many people believe it?

No I simply find it interesting that many people irrespective of their beliefs accept evolution theory (so for them, in terms of deciding its validity, it's not relevant whether or not God exists).

On the other hand, there are some theories which appear to be accepted exclusively by some who do believe in a God. It strikes me as strange that no non-religious person (at least no-one I know of), for example, accepts the evidence for a young Earth. Which leads me to conclude that belief in God is a pre-requisite to believing in a young Earth.

i.e. accepting evolution theory doesn't require an a priori assumption, but accepting something like a young Earth does seem to.

Regards, Ian
Post #: 53
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 1:31:18 AM   
miessemusic

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 4/15/2008
Status: offline
Sir,

You should check out Ben Stein's movie/documentary "Expelled: No intelligence allowed"

In select theaters this Friday, the 18th.

Just a suggestion.

Here's the link:

www.expelledthemovie.com

God Bless.

Rick
Post #: 54
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 1:37:53 AM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: miessemusic

Sir,

You should check out Ben Stein's movie/documentary "Expelled: No intelligence allowed"

In select theaters this Friday, the 18th.

Just a suggestion.

Here's the link:

www.expelledthemovie.com

God Bless.

Rick


Also, after watching the movie, check out http://expelledexposed.com ;)
Post #: 55
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 1:41:35 AM   
miessemusic

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 4/15/2008
Status: offline
So the atheists/evolutionists have already devised a propaganda counter attack on Expelled heh?

I'll never understand why you all continue to fight a losing battle instead of recognizing the fact that God loves you and wants you to know Him.

It really doesn't make any logical sense to me why you reject God's free gift of eternal life, but it's your choice.

God bless you.
Post #: 56
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 1:43:40 AM   
miessemusic

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 4/15/2008
Status: offline
And contrary to what evolutionists/atheists try to push, the theory of evolution is not a fact, it's a philosophical assumption, and always will be.

But Jesus however isn't an assumption. He is the Truth.
Post #: 57
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 1:52:31 AM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: miessemusic

And contrary to what evolutionists/atheists try to push, the theory of evolution is not a fact, it's a philosophical assumption, and always will be.

But Jesus however isn't an assumption. He is the Truth.


Portions of evolution are fact and some portions are theory, and will forever remain so.
Post #: 58
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 1:55:25 AM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: miessemusic

So the atheists/evolutionists have already devised a propaganda counter attack on Expelled heh?



Atheists are not necessarily evolutionists and evolutionists are not necessarily atheists. May I suggest you look into a book called "Finding Darwin's God"?
Post #: 59
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 1:57:05 AM   
miessemusic

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 4/15/2008
Status: offline
An atheist cannot be anything but an evolutionist. If he/she were the exact opposite (believing in the Creator and His intelligent Design), then he/she wouldn't be deemed the title: ATHEIST
Post #: 60
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 1:59:41 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7034
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: online
quote:

Also, after watching the movie, check out http://expelledexposed.com


Wow, some major factual errors on that site, especially about eugenics. Pretty sad for a site created by the National Center for Science Education.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 61
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 2:04:28 AM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: miessemusic
An atheist cannot be anything but an evolutionist. If he/she were the exact opposite (believing in the Creator and His intelligent Design), then he/she wouldn't be deemed the title: ATHEIST


One doesn't have anything to do with the other. Atheists can believe anything they want about life and how it operates... only if that belief involves god, they cease being atheists. You can be skeptical of evolution without believing in ID or creationism.

ID is even sold as a theory that doesn't require or infer a god. There's not supposed to be anything religious about ID... or at least thats what they say to try and sneak it into the science classes. If you take ID at face value, the way its proponents try and pitch it to schools, you could very well be atheist and believe ID. But we do know that sales pitch is mostly a farce.
Post #: 62
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 2:07:27 AM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

Also, after watching the movie, check out http://expelledexposed.com


Wow, some major factual errors on that site, especially about eugenics. Pretty sad for a site created by the National Center for Science Education.


If only you would be so critical of ID literature/movies.
Post #: 63
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 2:09:42 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7034
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: online
quote:

ID is even sold as a theory that doesn't require or infer a god. There's not supposed to be anything religious about ID... or at least thats what they say to try and sneak it into the science classes. If you take ID at face value, the way its proponents try and pitch it to schools, you could very well be atheist and believe ID. But we do know that sales pitch is mostly a farce.


Yeah, we are secretly trying to take over the minds of students so we can force them to be irreducibly complex - nefarious, I know, but we have to make a living, you know?

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 64
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 2:11:10 AM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

ID is even sold as a theory that doesn't require or infer a god. There's not supposed to be anything religious about ID... or at least thats what they say to try and sneak it into the science classes. If you take ID at face value, the way its proponents try and pitch it to schools, you could very well be atheist and believe ID. But we do know that sales pitch is mostly a farce.


Yeah, we are secretly trying to take over the minds of students so we can force them to be irreducibly complex - nefarious, I know, but we have to make a living, you know?


I can't speak for you, but its Discovery Institutes documented mission. Thats not really disputable. Maybe they don't speak for the whole movement, but they are certainly the biggest single entity out there pushing ID.
Post #: 65
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 2:13:33 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7034
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: online
quote:

can't speak for you, but its Discovery Institutes documented mission. Thats not really disputable. Maybe they don't speak for the whole movement, but they are certainly the biggest single entity out there pushing ID.


I already confessed the secret plot; to make students intelligent designers - as we all know, that is completely contrary to current policy in the American education establishment.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 66
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 2:27:35 AM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

can't speak for you, but its Discovery Institutes documented mission. Thats not really disputable. Maybe they don't speak for the whole movement, but they are certainly the biggest single entity out there pushing ID.


I already confessed the secret plot; to make students intelligent designers - as we all know, that is completely contrary to current policy in the American education establishment.


I see what you did there. Unfortunately, as bad as our schools are, DI and creationists just try and make them worse ;)
Post #: 67
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 2:34:07 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7034
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: online
quote:

I see what you did there. Unfortunately, as bad as our schools are, DI and creationists just try and make them worse


I agree, because questions lead to doubt, and doubt leads to skepticism, and skepticism leads critical thinking, and that stops students from mindlessly parroting what they are spoon fed.

Wouldn't want that would we?

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 68
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 2:44:46 AM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

I see what you did there. Unfortunately, as bad as our schools are, DI and creationists just try and make them worse


I agree, because questions lead to doubt, and doubt leads to skepticism, and skepticism leads critical thinking, and that stops students from mindlessly parroting what they are spoon fed.

Wouldn't want that would we?


Well, I rather like Ken Miller's idea about text book warning labels. When the Kansas school board decided to put warning labels on their science textbooks that read something to the effect of 'Evolution is just a theory, and its probably not true, its for godless heathens, blah blah blah', Ken said the warning labels didn't go far enough. In his eyes, those warning labels told kids that we are absolutely certain about everything else in that book, except evolution. His warning label would have told kids to treat everything in the science book with skepticism and open-mindedness.

I'm all for introducing skepticism and critical thinking into the classroom... but that still doesn't mean ID or creationism have a place there.

< Message edited by drj11 -- 4/15/2008 2:52:16 AM >
Post #: 69
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 9:18:23 AM   
DanJames


Posts: 457
Joined: 12/13/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drj11

I'm all for introducing skepticism and critical thinking into the classroom... but that still doesn't mean ID or creationism have a place there.


OW! OW!! OW!!!! You're pegging my irony meter!!!!
Post #: 70
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 9:35:18 AM   
unclemonkey


Posts: 1296
Joined: 5/14/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL:Jhus
quote:

Pretty sad for a site created by the National Center for Science Education.

Quite predictable though.

_____________________________

Visit my home church.
Also consider Life's Most Important Queston
Post #: 71
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 9:42:30 AM   
unclemonkey


Posts: 1296
Joined: 5/14/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL:drj11
quote:

ID is even sold as a theory that doesn't require or infer a god. There's not supposed to be anything religious about ID... or at least thats what they say to try and sneak it into the science classes.

Inferring the supernatural (God) from the empirical evidence is not religious. I.e. the pursuit of science regardless of where the evidence leads is not religious even if the evidence points to a Creator God.

quote:

If you take ID at face value, the way its proponents try and pitch it to schools, you could very well be atheist and believe ID.

ROFLOL!!!!!! THE REASON ID is fought against is because it infers the supernatural, a concept atheism rejects as an a priori assumption. It is BECAUSE ID infers the supernatural that the opposition falsely labels it religious.

_____________________________

Visit my home church.
Also consider Life's Most Important Queston
Post #: 72
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 10:26:03 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7034
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: online
quote:

Well, I rather like Ken Miller's idea about text book warning labels. When the Kansas school board decided to put warning labels on their science textbooks that read something to the effect of 'Evolution is just a theory, and its probably not true, its for godless heathens, blah blah blah', Ken said the warning labels didn't go far enough. In his eyes, those warning labels told kids that we are absolutely certain about everything else in that book, except evolution. His warning label would have told kids to treat everything in the science book with skepticism and open-mindedness.

I'm all for introducing skepticism and critical thinking into the classroom... but that still doesn't mean ID or creationism have a place there.


See, it's things like this that make realize that evolutionists either don't know what they are talking about, or just make things up and believe them.

The 'warning labels' as you call them were a sticker put on biology text books by the Alabama State Board of Education. The final form read as follows:

The following position statement regarding scientific theories is included in this document. The word "theory" has many meanings. Theories are defined as systematically organized knowledge, abstract reasoning, speculative ideas or plans, or systematic statements of principles. Scientific theories are based on both observations of and assumptions about the natural world. They are always subject to change in view of new and confirmed observations.

Many scientific theories have been developed over time. The value of scientific work, however, is not only the development of theories but also what is learned from the development process. The Alabama Course of Study: Science was developed within the context of trying to establish scientific literacy, not to question or diminish one's beliefs and/or faith. To that end, this document includes many theories and studies of scientists' works for examination by students. The works of Copernicus, Newton, and Einstein, to name a few, have provided a basis for much of our knowledge of the world today.

The theory of evolution by natural selection, a theory included in this document, states that natural selection provides the basis for the modern scientific explanation for the diversity of living things. Since natural selection has been observed to play a role in influencing small changes in a population, it is assumed, based on the study of artifacts, that it produces large changes, even though this has not been directly observed. Because of its importance and implications, students should understand the nature of evolutionary theories. They should learn to make distinctions between the multiple meanings of evolution, to distinguish between observations and assumptions used to draw conclusions, and to wrestle with the unanswered questions and unresolved problems still faced by evolutionary theory.

There are many unanswered questions about the origin of life. With the explosion of new scientific knowledge in biochemical and molecular biology and exciting new fossil discoveries, Alabama students may be among those who use their understanding and skills to contribute to knowledge and to answer many unanswered questions. Instructional materials chosen to implement the content standards within this course of study should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered.


Nothing in there about evolution being 'probably not true' or the 'its for godless heathen' etc.

So your factually wrong mischaracterization of what happened bears no resemblance to the reality of the matter, and you should really spend a little time investigating statements before you make them.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 73
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 12:08:25 PM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud
See, it's things like this that make realize that evolutionists either don't know what they are talking about, or just make things up and believe them.

The 'warning labels' as you call them were a sticker put on biology text books by the Alabama State Board of Education. The final form read as follows:


My mistake. I was 75% sure it was Kansas, but I just decided to go with it because it was late. It doesn't diminish the point.

quote:



There are many unanswered questions about the origin of life. With the explosion of new scientific knowledge in biochemical and molecular biology and exciting new fossil discoveries, Alabama students may be among those who use their understanding and skills to contribute to knowledge and to answer many unanswered questions. Instructional materials chosen to implement the content standards within this course of study should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered.

Nothing in there about evolution being 'probably not true' or the 'its for godless heathen' etc.

So your factually wrong mischaracterization of what happened bears no resemblance to the reality of the matter, and you should really spend a little time investigating statements before you make them.


Well, hey I exaggerated for effect, I thought that was obvious. I'll remember not to next time because you'll accuse me of making stuff up. How is that warning label anything but harmful? Its clearly and specifically mentions evolution the midst of all its dressed up talk about open-mindedness, clearly to put it in kids minds that evolution is a 'shakey theory', specifically... but don't worry about anything else. Here's the previous warning label, that had been running for roughly 5 years, and it will show you exactly what the purpose of all these warning labels is.

quote:


This textbook discusses evolution, a controversial theory some scientists present as a scientific explanation for the origin of living things, such as plants, animals and humans.

No one was present when life first appeared on earth. Therefore, any statement about life's origins should be considered as theory, not fact.

The word "evolution" may refer to many types of change. Evolution describes changes that occur within a species. (White moths, for example, may "evolve" into gray moths.) This process is microevolution, which can be observed and described as fact. Evolution may also refer to the change of one living thing to another, such as reptiles into birds. This process, called macroevolution, has never been observed and should be considered a theory. Evolution also refers to the unproven belief that random, undirected forces produced a world of living things.

There are many unanswered questions about the origin of life which are not mentioned in your textbooks, including:

Why did the major groups of animals suddenly appear in the fossil record (known as the Cambrian Explosion)?
Why have no new major groups of living things appeared in the fossil record in a long time?
Why do major groups of plants and animals have no transitional forms in the fossil record?
How did you and all living things come to possess such a complete and complex set of "instructions" for building a living body?
Study hard and keep an open mind. Someday you may contribute to the theories of how living things appeared on earth.
Post #: 74
RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities - 4/15/2008 12:55:13 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7034
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: online
quote:

Well, hey I exaggerated for effect, I thought that was obvious. I'll remember not to next time because you'll accuse me of making stuff up. How is that warning label anything but harmful? Its clearly and specifically mentions evolution the midst of all its dressed up talk about open-mindedness, clearly to put it in kids minds that evolution is a 'shakey theory', specifically... but don't worry about anything else. Here's the previous warning label, that had been running for roughly 5 years, and it will show you exactly what the purpose of all these warning labels is.


Well, thank you for acknowledging your error here.

The better question is "How is it specifically harmful"? It's on a biology textbook - what other theories would you have them highlight?

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 75
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Science & Origins >> RE: Denying evolution - couple of curiousities
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to: