Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events



Message

Leslie_JnJs_mom -> Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (4/25/2008 3:21:28 PM)

Oh my lands this is so sad. Yesterday they said she would be ok but today scanning the news site this was the headline.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352621,00.html



garsyt -> RE: Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (4/25/2008 4:16:17 PM)

Yep this is so sad! She ended up losing both babies. Still praying they get the gunman and the others suspected of robbing that bank and that they are charged with the deaths of these little ones!

Blessings,

Garsy



CatholicCritter -> RE: Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (4/25/2008 5:55:09 PM)

[:(]

praying for all involved.



ljmac -> RE: Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (4/28/2008 12:10:55 PM)

In 2004 Pro-life President George W. Bush signed the Unborn Victoms of Violence Act, also called the Laci and Conner Peterson law. The ACLU, NOW and the Democratic Party were strongly opposed.

In the US House 207 Republicans and only 47 Democrats voted for the law. In the Senate 48 Republicans voted yes and only 13 Democrats.

Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry said, ""I have serious concerns about this legislation because the law cannot simultaneously provide that a fetus is a human being and protect the right of the mother to choose to terminate her pregnancy." The law explicitly stated that it did not apply to abortion.

If it wasn't for liberals, who would stand up for those who want to kill the unborn?



MissInnocent -> RE: Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (4/28/2008 7:17:40 PM)

Actually before the Laci Peterson thing ever happened and Bush signed that act, I saw a case on Dateline of a woman who was pregnant and got hit by a drunk driver causing her to lose the baby and he was changed with causing the baby's death. But here's the kicker! It only matters if they consider the baby to have been viable to live outside the womb, I heard the teller was 5 months pregnant, they don't (that I know of yet) consider a baby under 24 weeks viable outside the womb (despite 21 weekers living) so even when they get this guy they won't punish him for the babies' deaths.



ljmac -> RE: Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (4/28/2008 11:39:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissInnocent

Actually before the Laci Peterson thing ever happened and Bush signed that act, I saw a case on Dateline of a woman who was pregnant and got hit by a drunk driver causing her to lose the baby and he was changed with causing the baby's death. But here's the kicker! It only matters if they consider the baby to have been viable to live outside the womb, I heard the teller was 5 months pregnant, they don't (that I know of yet) consider a baby under 24 weeks viable outside the womb (despite 21 weekers living) so even when they get this guy they won't punish him for the babies' deaths.


No, the law defines the victim as "a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development" in utero.

http://www.nrlc.org/Unborn_Victims/UVVAEnrolled.html



Leslie_JnJs_mom -> RE: Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (4/29/2008 8:22:25 PM)

Yep I remember that one woman who was killed by her boyfriend was only 6-8 weeks along yet they were at least talking of using this law for the first time. Our liberal media as it is never reported if they actually used it.



Annie64 -> RE: Pregnant bank teller gets shot in stomach (5/4/2008 12:37:59 AM)

I just heard on our local news (I live in Indianapolis, only a couple miles from where this happened), that this lady will be returning to South America when she is released from the hospital. I can't blame her. [&o]I'm praying for her, and my church has been praying for her. I hope they eventually catch the guys who did this, and that they do charge them with a double homicide. This is Indiana, not California or some other liberal state, so I think it's possible.



Page: [1]



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI