|
phosadaud -> RE: Asking For Your Offering Back (5/27/2008 11:00:56 PM)
|
I'm a church bookkeeper so I can speak to this. If you specifically designated funds for a specific project, a church or charity must use those funds for that particular project or not use those funds at all. If those funds are used for anything else, donors can sue the organization and will likely win. And this does happen (a certain Scripture comes to mind though regarding the sad state of affairs it is when believers sue each other though...). It doesn't matter if the pastor isn't going to get paid and the water to the church got turned off. Those funds cannot be released by the church for another purpose... Period... Of course, if the church was in that circumstance, the donors can (and IMHO should) release the church from it's legal obligation for their particular designations. As far as returning those funds, that can get sticky and depends on the circumstances. For instance, a church would actually be risking it's tax exempt status and the deductibility of all charitable donations to it if it returned someone's tithe. In the case of designated funds, if the church decides not to do the project (for instance, a new building), they can return those donations (and should offer IMHO) or the donors can release the church of the obligation to use it for that project and those funds become "undesignated" or "designated" for something else. This is different from someone deciding that they don't want those funds to go for that project but the project is still going to occur. In that case, the church is under no obligation to return the funds and it would be detrimental to the church and other donors in the church for it to do so. I actually keep records of all designated funds. Some are projects that are ongoing so the funds flow in and out (for instance, offerings for specific missions projects). Others are for things we have no plans to do anytime in the near future, so those funds are untouchable and basically sit in the bank and earn interest (which by the way, the church COULD use as it sees fit).
|
|
|
|