|
figmentPez -> RE: Mac or PC? What's right for me? (6/9/2008 10:38:17 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cowgurl4christ -Lots of RAM...but what's the minimum I should get? Well, RAM is pretty cheap right now, so I'd say 4GB for whatever you get (Mac or PC, XP or Vista). If you get a 32-bit OS you'll only be able to see part of that (probably around 3 - 3.5 GB) but I hope computer makers aren't charging too much for 4GB versus 2GB (I recently built a new box myself, and I got 4G of DDR2-800 RAM for $80) quote:
-Intel Core 2 Duo Processor?....Do I go Duo or Quad? I'm not familiar with the specific programs you're running. However, what I've been told about dual vs. quad is that 3D rendering especially, and video encoding as well, are two application types that take the greatest advantage of extra cores. There are other things that are more important than 2 more cores, but chances are the pro-level rendering/encoding you'll be doing will benefit from four slightly slower cores over two slightly faster ones. As to what I'd make sure to spend enough money on before extra cores: RAM, Monitor, UPS, input devices (mouse, keyboard, tablet, etc.), hard drive (video takes a lot of space, as I'm sure you know, maybe an external drive as well for backup/storage), video card (especially if your rendering uses the GPU power), quote:
-no vista. If it's as bad as I'm hearing... Well, I've been using Vista for the last week or so, and it's certainly not as bad as I've heard. It does have some annoying points (why oh why do I have to confirm the deletion of some files 4 or more times????!), but mostly it's a lot like XP with a few nice new features. I can't say I recommend Vista, but I certainly don't think it's the horror story that some people paint it as. quote:
-Specifically what graphics card should I look for? I hear ATI Mobility Radeon is great. Mobility would be a mobile chip, for laptops. If you're getting a desktop you'll be looking for something different. If you need lots of 3D processing power in a graphics card, I'd suggest waiting until next month if possible when the new video cards from nVidia and ATI will come out, both offerings look to be significant increases over the past generation. If you're buying now, look at ATI 3870, nVidia 9600GT or 8800GT for high-mid-range options. If you don't need lots of 3D power, and just want a competent video card with HD decoding ability, then most ATI or nVidia offerings will be fine. With either series I'd got with the x6xx or better (i.e. an ATI Radeon HD 3450 is likely to not be as good as a 2600XT, despite being a newer card). quote:
*Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Processor vs. *Intel® Core™ 2 Quad Processor Q9300 (6MB Cache,2.50GHz,1333FSB) There is a huge gap between these two processors! Not only is the E4500 only 2.2Ghz, but it's only got 2MB of cache (which should play a big role in the type of processing you'll be doing) and only an 800Mhz FSB. This isn't just 2 cores vs. 4 cores, these two chips are in completely different classes. Now, if you were to compare that Quad to a E8500 which is in roughly the same price range. It's a dual-core chip running at 3.15Ghz and also has 6MB cache and 1333FSB. If it were between those two chips (4 cores at 2.5Ghz vs. 2 cores at 3.15Ghz), then it would be a tough choice. Extra cores would provide better performance in some applications, like rendering, but the faster clock speed would win out for most games and any applications that aren't multi-threaded past two cores. quote:
*No Modem Requested--So I wouldn't have a wireless network card? I use a router with my laptop to get internet from the cable internet in my house. Modem most likely refers to the older type of telephone line modems, for dial-up internet stuff. I don't think it's common for desktop computers to come with wireless cards, though you can certainly get one if you need it. (I like wired connections myself, if possible). quote:
what's a "SuperDrive" mean? CD/DVD RW+/-? Dual-Layer DVD? I'm pretty sure that the current definition of SuperDrive means it supports all the latest writeable optical media formats. quote:
Plus, I'd wait until the next OS comes out for Windows because I don't want Vista. Well, if Microsoft rushes Windows 7 out, you'll be waiting until at least next year (late 2009 at the earliest, I hear)... and it's going to be based on Vista, not the new "MinWin" some were hoping for. If there are delays, however, and most MS operating systems have been delayed, it could be several years before Windows 7 comes out.
|
|
|
|