|
Stephanos -> RE: Senate Dinning Room (6/9/2008 7:11:18 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: iluvatar quote:
ORIGINAL: colliefan Another thing that bugs me is the percentage of milliionares in the Senate? And they can't pay for their own chow? Where does it say that they don't pay for their own food? In fact, the article says just the opposite - that prices would go up 25% if the service wasn't privatized and that this new company would give a cut of the profits back to the Senate. You can't make a profit w/o charging money. What the article did say was that the current management operated w/o concern for making a profit. -Dan. The point is Dan, that Congress, specifically the majority of Dems and moderates in Congress, resist efforts to privatize things like Social Security, but the second THEIR money is at sake, they jump to privatize their cafe so THEY dont have to pay more. Regardless on how the current management ran things, the fact they would rather privatize the cafe instead of paying more is rather revealing. Again, especially in light of their resistance to privatize anything else.
|
|
|
|