Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Fun] >> Southern Gospel



Message

danielmount -> Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 9:27:19 AM)

Steve Eaton started a thread on this year's male quartets with this idea:

quote:

Now that the final five ballot is out, instead of doing the same ole' poll question, let's do something a little different. Rank this year's top five quartet nominees from 1 to 5. The quartet you rank 1 will get 5 points, 2 will get 4 points, 3 will get 3 points, 4 will get 2 points and 5 will get 1 point. In about a month I'll tally the points and we will determine a winner. I'll start.


Let's do the same thing with mixed quartets. :)

1. Perrys (5)
2. Collingsworth Family (4)
3. Hoppers (3)
4. McKameys (2)
5. Isaacs (1)



DeeAnnBailey -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 9:28:49 AM)

Perrys (5)
Hoppers (4)
Collingsworth Family (3)
Isaacs (2)
Mckameys (1)

I stayed with the standard format here but I started not to! [:D]



Seaton -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 9:29:14 AM)

Hey Daniel, you beat me to it, but I am glad you started it. Now we just need one for Trio and Artist. [:D]

1. Hoppers (5 points)
2. Perrys (4 Points)
3. Isaacs (3 Points)
4. Collingsworth Family (2 Points)
5. McKameys (1 Point)



Dinana -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 9:37:32 AM)

1. Collingsworth Family (5 Points)
2. Hoppers (4 Points)
3. Perrys (3 Points)
4. Isaacs (2 Points)
5. McKameys (1 Point)



dixiebass1 -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 10:01:00 AM)

I would have to say that the Isaacs would have to be my top pick. They put out quality material. You alwayus get somwthing different. I am not a big fan of any of the other ones because project after project sound the same. Sorry if it sounds like I am in a bad mood today on all of my posts. I NEED my morning Coffee!!!!lol[:@]



gospelady -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 10:04:54 AM)

1. Perrys
2. Hoppers
3. Isaacs
4. Collingsworth
5. McKameys



BBfan -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 10:08:16 AM)

1. Issacs (5pt)
2. Hoppers (4pts)
3. Perrys (3pts)
4. Collingsworth Family (2pts)
5. McKameys (1pt)



cinwood -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 10:12:53 AM)

1. Isaacs (5)
2. Perrys (4)
3. Hoppers (3)
4. McKameys (2)
5. Collingsworths (1)



TheKid -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 10:13:22 AM)

1. Perrys (5)
2. Collingsworths (2.5)
3. Hoppers (2.5)
4. Isaacs (2.5)
5. Lesters (2.5)

Boy it's hard to pick other than personal preferences. I do agree that some of these groups (as with all groups) seem to repeat themselves with each project. Of course if its working why take a chance and change.



GVfan -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 11:06:15 AM)

2. Collingsworth Family (5)
3. Hoppers (4)
5. Isaacs (3)
1. Perrys (3)
4. McKameys (0)



dbmurray -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 11:09:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfan

1. Issacs (5pt)
2. Hoppers (4pts)
3. Perrys (3pts)
4. Collingsworth Family (2pts)
5. McKameys (1pt)


Double this list and count it for me. That's the same way I would rank them.



sgf_brad -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 11:28:23 AM)

1. Perrys (5)
2. Hoppers (4)
3. Collingsworth Family (3)
4. McKameys (2)
5. Isaacs (1)

This list was easier than the quartets list. The Perrys are a very easy choice for number 1 with me. The others were pretty easy to rank as well. I still like the Isaacs, but I really miss Joe Isaacs and Tim Surrett(they were real bluegrass then). [:)]



hoppersfan -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 11:32:43 AM)

1. Hoppers (5 points)
2. Perrys (4 points)
3. Isaacs (3 points)
4. Collingsworth Family (2 points)
5. McKameys (1 point)



LRBB -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 11:42:20 AM)

Perrys (5)
Hoppers (4)
McKameys (3)
Isaacs (2)
Collingsworth Family (1)

I ranked the Collingsworth Family last out of the five bases solely on the fact that I've never heard anything from them.



RogerBennett_Fan -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 1:16:36 PM)

1. Isaacs (5)
2. McKameys (4)
3. Hoppers (3)
4. Perry's (2)
5. Collingsworth Family (1)



H.L. -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 3:00:23 PM)

1. Perrys, definitely
2. McKameys
3. Collingsworth Family
4. Hoppers
5. Isaacs



TQ_Fan_4_Life -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 3:29:03 PM)

Isaacs, Hoppers, and Crist Family are my three faves. and I say is a sad thing when that very talented family wasn't in top 5.



Saved_2_Serve -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 4:47:24 PM)

1. Hoppers (5)
2. Isaac's (4)
3. McKameys (3)
4. Perry's (2)
5. Collingsworth Family (1)



Jeff_from_Kentucky -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 6:42:06 PM)

1. Isaacs 5 points
2. Perrys 2 points
tie with everyone else 1 point each.

Sorry but the Isaacs are the only mixed group of the five that I really like.



floridacracker -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 8:03:51 PM)

1)Collingsworth Family (5)
2)Isaacs (4)
3)Hoppers (3)
4)Perrys (2)
5)Mckameys (1)



DrivenqtFan -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 10:57:28 PM)

1./2. (tie) Hoppers and Perrys
3. Isaacs
4. McKameys
5. Collingsworth Family (to be fair, I'll admit that I've heard little or nothing from them, so I can't rate them fairly. But I know from pianorama that Kim is a great pianist.)



Kerrlaw -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/19/2008 11:21:12 PM)

1. Hoppers (5 points)
2. Perrys (4 Points)
3. Collingsworth Family (3 Points)
4. Isaacs (2 Points)
5. McKameys (1 Point)



Seaton -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/20/2008 7:29:03 AM)

Continue ranking the mixed groups. Here is a current tally of points.

1. Hoppers - 78 points
2. Perrys - 75.5 points
3. Isaacs - 71.5 points
4. Collingsworth Family - 49.5 points
5. McKameys - 34.5 points



Dinana -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/20/2008 7:52:11 AM)

WOW! This one is really surprising me!



Seaton -> RE: Rank This Year's Mixed Groups (6/20/2008 8:02:04 AM)

Just in case any questions arise, let me tell you how points were tallied. Anyone ranking all five aritsts were counted as such. To not leave anyone out I also counted individuals who may have only listed several artists. There was one who only listed the Isaacs and no one else. In that case I gave the Isaacs (5) points. There was another instance where an individual only listed the Isaccs and the Hoppers. In that case I gave the Isaacs (5) points and the Hoppers (4). In the instance where the Perrys and Hoppers were listed as a tie, I gave the Perrys and Hoppers each (4.5 points). I hope that is fair.



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI